ArticleActa neurochirurgica. Supplement2020
Cerebral Arterial Compliance in Polytraumazed Patients with Cerebral Vasospasm.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cerebral Critical Closing Pressure in Concomitant Traumatic Brain Injury and Intracranial Hematomas.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose was to determine the status of the cerebral arterial compliance (cAC) in a concomitant head injury and cerebral vasospasm (CVS) with and without the development of intracranial hematomas (ICH). In Materials and Methods, we examined 80 polytrauma patients with severe TBI and CVS. During or immediately after dynamic helical computed tomography angiography (DHCTA), the monitoring of the transcranial Doppler of the MCA was recorded bilaterally with 2-MHz probes. The cerebral blood volumes were calculated from the DHCTA data with complex mathematical procedures using the "direct flow model" algorithm. In Results, CAC was significantly decreased (p < 0.001) in both the first and second group TBI and CVS (with or without ICH) in comparison with normal data (p < 0.001) and TBI without CVS. The cAC was significantly decreased on the side of the former hematoma with CVS than on the contralateral side with CVS (р = 0.003). In Conclusion, the cAC in TBI and CVS gets significantly lower as compared to the normal condition (p < 0.001). After removal of the ICH and development of CVS, the compliance in the perifocal zone remains much lower (р = 0.003) as compared to compliance of the other brain hemisphere.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.