ArticleHeliyon2019
Visualizing Alzheimer's disease progression in low dimensional manifolds.
Article in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Statistical variability in comparing accuracy of neuroimaging based classification models via cross validation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Two-Dimensional Latent Space Manifold of Brain Connectomes Across the Spectrum of Clinical Cognitive Decline.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Integrating Demographics and Imaging Features for Various Stages of Dementia Classification: Feed Forward Neural Network Multi-Class Approach.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- A unique color-coded visualization system with multimodal information fusion and deep learning in a longitudinal study of Alzheimer's disease.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2023Article
- A whole new world: embracing the systems-level to understand the indirect impact of pathology in neurodegenerative disorders.Journal of neurology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While tomographic neuroimaging data is information rich, objective, and with high sensitivity in the study of brain diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), its direct use in clinical practice and in regulated clinical trial (CT) still has many challenges. Taking CT as an example, unless the relevant policy and the perception of the primary outcome measures change, the need to construct univariate indices (out of the 3-D imaging data) to serve as CT's primary outcome measures will remain the focus of active research. More relevant to this current study, an overall global index that summarizes multiple complicated features from neuroimages should be developed in order to provide high diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity in tracking AD progression over time in clinical setting. Such index should also be practically intuitive and logically explainable to patients and their families. In this research, we propose a new visualization tool, derived from the manifold-based nonlinear dimension reduction of brain MRI features, to track AD progression over time. In specific, we investigate the locally linear embedding (LLE) method using a dataset from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), which includes the longitudinal MRIs from 562 subjects. About 20% of them progressed to the next stage of dementia. Using only the baseline data of cognitively unimpaired (CU) and AD subjects, LLE reduces the feature dimension to two and a subject's AD progression path can be plotted in this low dimensional LLE feature space. In addition, the likelihood of being categorized to AD is indicated by color. This LLE map is a new data visualization tool that can assist in tracking AD progression over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.