ArticleData in brief2019
Inter-participant variability data in characterization of anthropomorphicity of prosthetic feet fitted to bone-anchored transtibial prosthesis.
Article in Data in brief, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Analyzing research trends and developments in osseointegration in patients with extremity amputations: Systematic bibliometric analysis and research recommendations.Prosthetics and orthotics international · 2025Pooled it
- Regulation of BBB function and pathological evolution of PD by microenvironment "spatiotemporal gradient": unique advantages of microfluidic chips.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Review
- Evidence-based recommendation of a powered knee for transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses: A cross-sectional study.Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal · 2025Article
- A Preliminary Cost-Utility Analysis of the Prosthetic Care Innovations: Case of the Keep Walking Implant.Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal · 2021Article
- Inter-participant variability data in loading applied on osseointegrated implant by transtibial bone-anchored prostheses during daily activities.Data in brief · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The data in this paper are related to the research article entitled "Automated characterization of anthropomorphicity of prosthetic feet fitted to bone-anchored transtibial prosthesis" (Frossard et al., 2019: DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2904713). This article contains the individual angles of dorsiflexion and bending moments generated while walking with transtibial bone-anchored prostheses including prosthetic feet with different index of anthropomorphicity. Inter-participant variability were presented for the (A) position of the load cell measuring directly to the bending moments, (B) patterns of angles of dorsiflexion and bending moment as well as moment-angle curves and (C) variations of magnitude of angles of dorsiflexion as well as the raw and bodyweight-normalized bending moments between toe contact and heel off. These initial inter-participant variability benchmark datasets are critical to design future automated algorithms and clinical trials. Online repository contains the files: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/127745/1/127745.pdf.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.