ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2019
Nurses' experiences with health care in pain clinics: A qualitative study.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chronic opioid prescription rates following long-segment lumbar instrumentation: A comparison of academic and nonacademic centers.North American Spine Society journal · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a non-pharmacological interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation and functional restoration program for chronic pain in veterans.Health services research · 2023Article
- Patients' Experience of Attending a Binge Eating Group Program - Qualitative Evaluation of a Pilot Study.SAGE open nursingArticle
- Perceptions of Retired Nurses on Factors Preventing Younger Professional Nurses from Applying the Ethos of Ubuntu in Professional Care.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent research has focused on the effectiveness of different treatment regimens in pain clinics, where a call for more multifaceted treatment has been highlighted. Less attention has been paid to improvements within pain clinics, and how registered nurses-who usually play a key role-perceive and experience the accessibility, treatment options and follow-up offers at public pain clinics.
objectiveThe overall aim was to explore and describe how nurses experience health care provided to patients with chronic non-cancer pain at pain clinics.
methodsWe used 10 individual interviews with nurses working at 10 different public pain clinics in Norway. The interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
resultsOne theme was developed from the content analysis: "Nurses' striving to provide whole-person care in pain clinics." The nurses experienced allocation of limited resources as challenging, especially when the dilemma between accepting new patients from the waiting list and offering follow-up to existing patients became apparent. Multifaceted treatment was perceived as vital, although resources, priorities, and theoretical understanding of pain within the team were challenging.
conclusionsThe needs for multifaceted and integrated treatments in chronic pain management were obvious, although this approach appeared to be too demanding of resources and time. Stronger cooperation between pain clinics in specialist care and health care providers in primary care to ensure better patient flow and treatment is required. Emphasis is placed on coherent theoretical approaches to pain management within the team in the pain clinics to ensure whole person care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.