Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31406688›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological research (Thessalonike, Greece)2019

Comparative transcriptional analysis of flavour-biosynthetic genes of a native

Maria Parapouli, Afroditi Sfakianaki, Nikolaos Monokrousos, Angelos Perisynakis, Efstathios Hatziloukas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological research (Thessalonike, Greece), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The impact ofFood chemistry: X · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Macrotranscriptomics analysis for decoding the role ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. AIMS microbiology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Parapouli1Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Department of Biological Applications & Technologies, University of Ioannina, 451 10 Ioannina, Greece.
Afroditi Sfakianaki2Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, 451 10 Ioannina, Greece.
Nikolaos MonokrousosDepartment of Soil Science of Athens, Institute of Soil and Water Resources, Hellenic Agricultural Organization-DEMETER, 141 23 Athens, Greece.
Angelos Perisynakis2Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Ioannina, 451 10 Ioannina, Greece.
Efstathios Hatziloukas1Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Department of Biological Applications & Technologies, University of Ioannina, 451 10 Ioannina, Greece.
University of Ioannina · GRAgricultural University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring alcoholic fermentation,

resultsStrain Z622, exhibited lower concentrations of 2-methylbutanol, 3-methylbutanol and 2-phenyl ethanol, than VL1 correlating with the elevated expression levels of transaminase and decarboxylase genes. Furthermore, the significantly high induction of

conclusionsThis study provides evidence on the transcriptional level that indigenous yeast Z622 is better adapted to its natural environment able to produce wines with desirable characteristics, i.e. lower concentrations of higher alcohol and higher ester, verifying its potential as a valuable starter for the local wine-industry.

Indexed as

Ester biosynthesisGene expressionHigher alcohols biosynthesisIndigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiaeqRT-PCR

Identifiers

PMID31406688
PMCPMC6683356
OpenAlexW2966704878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.