Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31406682›Full record

ReviewToxicology reports2019

Mukesh Meena, Swarnmala Samal

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxicology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
36.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 232 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An Overview of theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Current research in food science · 2026
    Review
  11. Mechanisms of action and biocontrol potential ofFrontiers in fungal biology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. AssessingToxins · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mukesh MeenaDepartment of Botany, University College of Science, Mohanlal Sukhadia University, Udaipur, 313001, India.
Swarnmala SamalCentre of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, India.
Banaras Hindu University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

1O2, singlet oxygenAA, ascorbic acidALT, alternueneAlternaria speciesAME, alternariol 9-monomethyl etherAOH, alternariolAPX, ascorbate peroxidaseATX, alterotoxinCAT, catalaseCDCs, conditionally dispensable chromosomesDHAR, dehydroascorbate reductaseDHT, dihydrotentoxinGPX, guaiacol peroxidaseGR, glutathione reductaseGSH, glutathioneH2O2, hydrogen peroxideHost-specific toxinsHR, hypersensitive responseHSTs, host specific toxinsMDHAR, monodehydroascorbate reductasenHSTs, non-host specific toxinsNon-host-specific toxinsNO, nitric oxideNRPS, nonribosomal peptide synthetaseO2˙ˉ, superoxide anion˙OH, hydroxyl radicalPathogenicityPCD, programmed cell deathPKS, polyketide synthase geneREMI, restriction enzyme-mediated integrationROS, reactive oxygen speciesSecondary metabolitesSMs, secondary metabolitesSOD, superoxide dismutaseTeA, tenuazonic acidTEN, tentoxinUGT, UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases

Identifiers

PMID31406682
PMCPMC6684332
OpenAlexW2956389443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.