Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31406658›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2019

Cytocompatible, Injectable, and Electroconductive Soft Adhesives with Hybrid Covalent/Noncovalent Dynamic Network.

Yong Xu, Panagiotis A Patsis, Sandra Hauser, Dagmar Voigt, Rebecca Rothe, Markus Günther, Meiying Cui, Xuegeng Yang, Robert Wieduwild, Kerstin Eckert and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hydrogel-based neural engineering for skin wound healing.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Electrically conductive "SMART" hydrogels for on-demand drug delivery.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yong XuB CUBE Center for Molecular Bioengineering Technische Universität Dresden Tatzberg 41 01307 Dresden Germany.
Panagiotis A PatsisB CUBE Center for Molecular Bioengineering Technische Universität Dresden Tatzberg 41 01307 Dresden Germany.
Sandra HauserHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research Department of Radiopharmaceutical and Chemical Biology Bautzner Landstraße 400 01328 Dresden Germany.
Dagmar VoigtInstitute for Botany Faculty of Biology School of Science Technische Universität Dresden 01062 Dresden Germany.
Rebecca RotheHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research Department of Radiopharmaceutical and Chemical Biology Bautzner Landstraße 400 01328 Dresden Germany.
Markus GüntherInstitute for Botany Faculty of Biology School of Science Technische Universität Dresden 01062 Dresden Germany.
Meiying CuiB CUBE Center for Molecular Bioengineering Technische Universität Dresden Tatzberg 41 01307 Dresden Germany.
Xuegeng YangHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR) Institute of Fluid Dynamics Bautzner Landstraße 400 01328 Dresden Germany.
Robert WieduwildB CUBE Center for Molecular Bioengineering Technische Universität Dresden Tatzberg 41 01307 Dresden Germany.
Kerstin EckertHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR) Institute of Fluid Dynamics Bautzner Landstraße 400 01328 Dresden Germany.
Christoph NeinhuisInstitute for Botany Faculty of Biology School of Science Technische Universität Dresden 01062 Dresden Germany.
Teuku Fawzul AkbarBiotechnology Center Technische Universität Dresden Tatzberg 47/49 01307 Dresden Germany.
Ivan R MinevBiotechnology Center Technische Universität Dresden Tatzberg 47/49 01307 Dresden Germany.
Jens PietzschHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research Department of Radiopharmaceutical and Chemical Biology Bautzner Landstraße 400 01328 Dresden Germany.
Yixin ZhangB CUBE Center for Molecular Bioengineering Technische Universität Dresden Tatzberg 41 01307 Dresden Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6669-4995
Technische Universität Dresden · DEHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf · DELeibniz Institute of Polymer Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic conductive biopolymers have gained increasing interest in tissue engineering, as they can provide a chemically defined electroconductive and biomimetic microenvironment for cells. In addition to low cytotoxicity and high biocompatibility, injectability and adhesiveness are important for many biomedical applications but have proven to be very challenging. Recent results show that fascinating material properties can be realized with a bioinspired hybrid network, especially through the synergy between irreversible covalent crosslinking and reversible noncovalent self-assembly. Herein, a polysaccharide-based conductive hydrogel crosslinked through noncovalent and reversible covalent reactions is reported. The hybrid material exhibits rheological properties associated with dynamic networks such as self-healing and stress relaxation. Moreover, through fine-tuning the network dynamics by varying covalent/noncovalent crosslinking content and incorporating electroconductive polymers, the resulting materials exhibit electroconductivity and reliable adhesive strength, at a similar range to that of clinically used fibrin glue. The conductive soft adhesives exhibit high cytocompatibility in 2D/3D cell cultures and can promote myogenic differentiation of myoblast cells. The heparin-containing electroconductive adhesive shows high biocompatibility in immunocompetent mice, both for topical application and as injectable materials. The materials could have utilities in many biomedical applications, especially in the area of cardiovascular diseases and wound dressing.

Indexed as

3D cell cultureadhesionbiocompatibilityPEDOTsmall animal magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID31406658
PMCPMC6685503
OpenAlexW2944997993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.