Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31406612›Full record

ArticleHealthcare informatics research2019

Deep Learning-Based Electrocardiogram Signal Noise Detection and Screening Model.

Dukyong Yoon, Hong Seok Lim, Kyoungwon Jung, Tae Young Kim, Sukhoon Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare informatics research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deep learning and the electrocardiogram: review of the current state-of-the-art.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Deep Learning in Physiological Signal Data: A Survey.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dukyong YoonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1635-8376
Hong Seok LimDepartment of Cardiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3127-2071
Kyoungwon JungDivision of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7895-0362
Tae Young KimDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2591-0129
Sukhoon LeeDepartment of Software Convergence Engineering, College of Convergence Engineering, Kunsan National University, Gunsan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3390-5602

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBiosignal data captured by patient monitoring systems could provide key evidence for detecting or predicting critical clinical events; however, noise in these data hinders their use. Because deep learning algorithms can extract features without human annotation, this study hypothesized that they could be used to screen unacceptable electrocardiograms (ECGs) that include noise. To test that, a deep learning-based model for unacceptable ECG screening was developed, and its screening results were compared with the interpretations of a medical expert.

methodsTo develop and apply the screening model, we used a biosignal database comprising 165,142,920 ECG II (10-second lead II electrocardiogram) data gathered between August 31, 2016 and September 30, 2018 from a trauma intensive-care unit. Then, 2,700 and 300 ECGs (ratio of 9:1) were reviewed by a medical expert and used for 9-fold cross-validation (training and validation) and test datasets. A convolutional neural network-based model for unacceptable ECG screening was developed based on the training and validation datasets. The model exhibiting the lowest cross-validation loss was subsequently selected as the final model. Its performance was evaluated through comparison with a test dataset.

resultsWhen the screening results of the proposed model were compared to the test dataset, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the F1-score of the model were 0.93 and 0.80 (sensitivity = 0.88, specificity = 0.89, positive predictive value = 0.74, and negative predictive value = 0.96).

conclusionsThe deep learning-based model developed in this study is capable of detecting and screening unacceptable ECGs efficiently.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElectrocardiographyNoisePhysiologic MonitoringSignal Detection Analysis

Identifiers

PMID31406612
PMCPMC6689506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.