Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31406583›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2019

Supportive supervision to improve the quality and outcome of outpatient care among malnourished children: a cluster randomised trial in Arua district, Uganda.

Marzia Lazzerini, Humphrey Wanzira, Peter Lochoro, Richard Muyinda, Giulia Segafredo, Henry Wamani, Giovanni Putoto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Marzia LazzeriniWHO Collaborating Centre, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8608-2198
Humphrey WanziraWHO Collaborating Centre, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1074-5340
Peter LochoroDoctors with Africa, CUAMM, Kampala, Uganda.
Richard MuyindaDoctors with Africa, CUAMM, Kampala, Uganda.
Giulia SegafredoDoctors with Africa, CUAMM, Kampala, Uganda.
Henry WamaniDepartment of Community Health and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Giovanni PutotoDoctors with Africa, CUAMM, Kampala, Uganda.
Doctors with Africa Cuamm · ITIRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo · ITFaculty of Public Health · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSuboptimal quality of paediatric care has been reported in resource-limited settings, but little evidence exists on interventions to improve it in such settings. This study aimed at testing supportive supervision (SS) for improving health status of malnourished children, quality of case management, overall quality of care, and the absolute number of children enrolled in the nutritional services.

methodsThis was a cluster randomised trial conducted in Arua district. Six health centres (HCs) with the highest volume of work were randomised to either SS or no intervention. SS was delivered by to HCs staff (phase 1), and later extended to community health workers (CHWs) (phase 2). The primary outcome was the cure rate, measured at children level. Quality of case management was assessed by six pre-defined indicators. Quality of care was assessed using the national Nutrition Service Delivery Assessment (NSDA) tool. Access to care was estimated with the number of children accessing HC nutritional services.

resultsOverall, 737 children were enrolled. In the intervention arm, the cure rate (83.8% vs 44.9%, risk ratio (RR)=1.91, 95% CI: 1.56-2.34, p=0.001), quality of care as scored by NSDA (RR=1.57, 95% CI: 1.01-2.44, p=0.035) and correctness in complementary treatment (RR=1.52, 95% CI: 1.40-1.67, p=0.001) were significantly higher compared with control. With the extension of SS to CHWs (phase 2), there was a significant 38.6% more children accessing care in the intervention HCs (RR=1.26, 95% CI: 1.11-1.44, p=0.001) compared with control.

conclusionSS significantly improved the cure rate of malnourished children, and the overall quality of care, SS to CHWs significantly increased the crude number of children enrolled in the nutritional services. More studies should confirm these results, and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of SS.

Indexed as

children under 5 yearsmalnutritionquality of carerandomised controlled trialsupportive supervision

Identifiers

PMID31406583
PMCPMC6666809
OpenAlexW2962896181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.