Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31406570›Full record

ArticleHealth information science and systems2019

Automated AJCC (7th edition) staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using deep convolutional neural network (CNN) and recurrent neural network (RNN).

Dipanjan Moitra, Rakesh Kr Mandal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health information science and systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Gated Graph Attention Network for Cancer Prediction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  18. A decision support system for mammography reports interpretation.Health information science and systems · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dipanjan MoitraUniversity of North Bengal, Siliguri, West Bengal India.
Rakesh Kr MandalUniversity of North Bengal, Siliguri, West Bengal India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA large chunk of lung cancers are of the type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Both the treatment planning and patients' prognosis depend greatly on factors like AJCC staging which is an abstraction over TNM staging. Many significant efforts have so far been made towards automated staging of NSCLC, but the groundbreaking application of a deep neural networks (DNNs) is yet to be observed in this domain of study. DNN is capable of achieving higher level of accuracy than the traditional artificial neural networks (ANNs) as it uses deeper layers of convolutional neural network (CNN). The objective of the present study is to propose a simple yet fast CNN model combined with recurrent neural network (RNN) for automated AJCC staging of NSCLC and to compare the outcome with a few standard machine learning algorithms along with a few similar studies.

methodsThe NSCLC radiogenomics collection from the cancer imaging archive (TCIA) dataset was considered for the study. The tumor images were refined and filtered by resizing, enhancing, de-noising, etc. The initial image processing phase was followed by texture based image segmentation. The segmented images were fed into a hybrid feature detection and extraction model which was comprised of two sequential phases: maximally stable extremal regions (MSER) and the speeded up robust features (SURF). After a prolonged experiment, the desired CNN-RNN model was derived and the extracted features were fed into the model.

resultsThe proposed CNN-RNN model almost outperformed the other machine learning algorithms under consideration. The accuracy remained steadily higher than the other contemporary studies.

conclusionThe proposed CNN-RNN model performed commendably during the study. Further studies may be carried out to refine the model and develop an improved auxiliary decision support system for oncologists and radiologists.

Indexed as

AJCCDeep learningLung cancerNeural networkRecurrentStaging

Identifiers

PMID31406570
PMCPMC6667593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.