Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31406558›Full record

ArticleMolecular autism2019

Impact of on-site clinical genetics consultations on diagnostic rate in children and young adults with autism spectrum disorder.

Arnold Munnich, Caroline Demily, Lisa Frugère, Charlyne Duwime, Valérie Malan, Giulia Barcia, Céline Vidal, Emeline Throo, Claude Besmond, Laurence Hubert and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular autism, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Identification of two novel autism genes,Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sex-Specific Social Behavior and Amygdala Proteomic Deficits inFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  16. Screening forBioMed research international · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Arnold MunnichFédération de Génétique Médicale, Institute Imagine, Inserm, Université Paris-Descartes, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Fondation Elan Retrouvé, Paris, France.
Caroline Demily2Centre de Reference Maladies Rares GénoPsy, Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier, Institut Marc Jeannerod, Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3663-8447
Lisa Frugère3Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Fondation Elan Retrouvé, Paris, France.
Charlyne Duwime3Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Fondation Elan Retrouvé, Paris, France.
Valérie MalanFédération de Génétique Médicale, Institute Imagine, Inserm, Université Paris-Descartes, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France.
Giulia BarciaFédération de Génétique Médicale, Institute Imagine, Inserm, Université Paris-Descartes, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France.
Céline VidalInstitute Imagine, Inserm, Université Paris-Descartes, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Fondation Elan Retrouvé, Paris, France.
Emeline ThrooInstitute Imagine, Inserm, Université Paris-Descartes, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Fondation Elan Retrouvé, Paris, France.
Claude BesmondInstitute Imagine, Inserm, Université Paris-Descartes, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France.
Laurence HubertInstitute Imagine, Inserm, Université Paris-Descartes, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France.
Gilles Roland-ManuelFondation Elan Retrouvé, Paris, France.
Jean-Pierre MalenFondation Elan Retrouvé, Paris, France.
Mélanie FerreriFondation Elan Retrouvé, Paris, France.
Sylvain HaneinInstitute Imagine, Inserm, Université Paris-Descartes, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France.
Jean-Christophe ThalabardMAP5, CNRS, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.
Nathalie BoddaertDepartment of Pediatric Radiology, Institute Imagine, Inserm, Université Paris-Descartes, Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France.
Moïse AssoulineFondation Elan Retrouvé, Paris, France.
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRInstitut Necker Enfants Malades · FRCentre Hospitalier Le Vinatier · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neurogenetics investigations and diagnostic yield in patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have significantly improved over the last few years. Yet, many patients still fail to be systematically investigated. Methods: To improve access to services, an ambulatory team has been established since 1998, delivering on-site clinical genetics consultations and gradually upgrading services to 502 children and young adults with ASD in their standard environment across 26 day-care hospitals and specialized institutions within the Greater Paris region. The evaluation included a clinical genetics consultation, screening for fragile X syndrome, metabolic workup, chromosomal microarray analysis, and, in a proportion of patients, next-generation sequencing of genes reported in ASD and other neurodevelopmental disorders. Results: Fragile X syndrome and pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) accounted for the disease in 10% of cases, including 4/312 (1.3%) with fragile X syndrome and 34/388 (8.8%) with pathogenic CNVs (19 de novo and 4 inherited). Importantly, adding high-throughput resequencing of reported intellectual disability/ASD genes to the screening procedure had a major impact on diagnostic yield in the 141 patients examined most recently. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic sequence variants in 27 disease genes were identified in 33/141 patients (23.4%; 23 were de novo and 10 inherited, including five X-linked and five recessive compound heterozygous variants). Diagnosed cases presented atypical and/or syndromic ASD with moderate to severe intellectual disability. The diagnostic yield of fragile X syndrome and array CGH testing combined with next-generation sequencing was significantly higher than fragile X syndrome and array CGH alone ( Conclusion: Based on the diagnostic rate observed in this cohort, we suggest that a stepwise procedure be considered, first screening pathogenic CNVs and a limited number of disease genes in a much larger number of patients, especially those with syndromic ASD and intellectual disability.

Indexed as

Genetics, MedicalReferral and ConsultationAdolescentAdultAutism Spectrum DisorderChildDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung AdultAutism spectrum disorderCopy number variantFragile X syndromeGene panelGenetic counselingGenetic diagnosisMicroarrayNext-generation sequencingSequence variant

Identifiers

PMID31406558
PMCPMC6686526
OpenAlexW2964798614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.