ArticleBiomicrofluidics2019
Simulations corroborate telegraph model predictions for the extension distributions of nanochannel confined DNA.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-molecule optical genome mapping in nanochannels: multidisciplinarity at the nanoscale.Essays in biochemistry · 2021Article
- Limitations of the equivalent neutral polymer assumption for theories describing nanochannel-confined DNA.Physical review. E · 2020Article
- Extension distribution for DNA confined in a nanochannel near the Odijk regime.The Journal of chemical physics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Hairpins in the conformation of DNA confined in nanochannels close to their persistence length cause the distribution of their fractional extensions to be heavily left skewed. A recent theory rationalizes these skewed distributions using a correlated telegraph process, which can be solved exactly in the asymptotic limit of small but frequent hairpin formation. Pruned-enriched Rosenbluth method simulations of the fractional extension distribution for a channel-confined wormlike chain confirm the predictions of the telegraph model. Remarkably, the asymptotic result of the telegraph model remains robust well outside the asymptotic limit. As a result, the approximations in the theory required to map it to the polymer model and solve it in the asymptotic limit are not the source of discrepancies between the predictions of the telegraph model and experimental distributions of the extensions of DNA during genome mapping. The agreement between theory and simulations motivates future work to determine the source of the remaining discrepancies between the predictions of the telegraph model and experimental distributions of the extensions of DNA in nanochannels used for genome mapping.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.