Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31406493›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in zoology2019

Landscape homogenization due to agricultural intensification disrupts the relationship between reproductive success and main prey abundance in an avian predator.

Petra Sumasgutner, Julien Terraube, Aurélie Coulon, Alexandre Villers, Nayden Chakarov, Luise Kruckenhauser, Erkki Korpimäki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Petra Sumasgutner1Department of Biology, Section of Ecology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7042-3461
Julien Terraube1Department of Biology, Section of Ecology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Aurélie Coulon5CEFE, CNRS, Univ Montpellier, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, Montpellier, France.
Alexandre VillersONCFS, Unité Avifaune Migratrice, Station de Chizé, 405 route de Prissé-la-Charrière, 79360 Villiers-en-Bois, France.
Nayden Chakarov8Department of Biology, Molecular Ecology and Evolution Lab, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Luise KruckenhauserMuseum of Natural History Vienna, Central Research Laboratories, Vienna, Austria.
Erkki Korpimäki1Department of Biology, Section of Ecology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelecting high-quality habitat and the optimal time to reproduce can increase individual fitness and is a strong evolutionary factor shaping animal populations. However, few studies have investigated the interplay between land cover heterogeneity, limitation in food resources, individual quality and spatial variation in fitness parameters. Here, we explore how individuals of different quality respond to possible mismatches between a cue for prey availability (land cover heterogeneity) and the actual fluctuating prey abundance.

resultsWe analyse timing of breeding and reproductive success in a migratory population of Eurasian kestrels (

conclusionsWe found a strong positive effect of landscape heterogeneity on nestling survival, but only when voles were relatively abundant, whereas a difference in the timing of breeding related to territory landscape heterogeneity was not evident. Therefore, landscape heterogeneity appeared as the main driver of high reproductive performance under favourable food conditions. Our results show that landscape homogenization linked to agricultural intensification disrupts the expected positive effect of vole abundance on reproductive success of kestrels.

Indexed as

Agro-ecosystemsBiodiversity conservationBoreal landscapesEurasian kestrelGlobal changeHeterozygosity–fitness correlationsIndividual qualityPredator-prey interactions

Identifiers

PMID31406493
PMCPMC6683578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.