Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31406487›Full record

ReviewCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2019

Systematic review and meta-analysis of public hospital efficiency studies in Gulf region and selected countries in similar settings.

Ahmed Alatawi, Sayem Ahmed, Louis Niessen, Jahangir Khan

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hospital performance evaluation models: A scoping review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Changes in productivity in healthcare services in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Efficiency and Productivity Change of Public Hospitals in Panama: Do Management Schemes Matter?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmed Alatawi1Health Economics Group, Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, LSTM, Room 1966-215-206, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6459-9700
Sayem Ahmed1Health Economics Group, Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, LSTM, Room 1966-215-206, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA UK.
Louis Niessen1Health Economics Group, Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, LSTM, Room 1966-215-206, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA UK.
Jahangir Khan1Health Economics Group, Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, LSTM, Room 1966-215-206, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe assessment of hospital efficiency is attracting interest worldwide, particularly in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. The objective of this study was to review the literature on public hospital efficiency and synthesise the findings in GCC countries and comparable settings.

methodsWe systematically searched six scientific databases, references and grey literature for studies that measured the efficiency of public hospitals in appropriate countries, and followed PRISMA guidelines to present the results. We summarised the included studies in terms of samples, methods/technologies and findings, then assessed their quality. We meta-analysed the efficiency estimates using Spearman's rank correlations and logistic regression, to examine the internal validity of the findings.

resultsWe identified and meta-analysed 22 of 1128 studies. Four studies were conducted in GCC nations, 18 came from Iran and Turkey. The pooled technical-efficiency (TE) was 0.792 (SE ± 0.03). There were considerable variations in model specification, analysis orientation and variables used in the studies, which influenced efficiency estimates. The studies lacked some elements required in quality appraisal, achieving an average of 73%. Meta-analysis showed negative correlations between sample size and efficiency scores; the odd ratio was 0.081 (CI 0.005: 1.300; P value = 0.07) at 10% risk level. The choice of model orientation was significantly influenced (82%) by the studied countries' income categories, which was compatible with the strategic plans of these countries.

conclusionsThe studies showed methodological and qualitative deficiencies that limited their credibility. Our review suggested that methodology and assumption choices have a substantial impact on efficiency measurements. Given the GCC countries' strategic plans and resource allocations, these nations need further efficiency research using high-quality data, different orientations and developed models. This will establish an evidence-based knowledge base appropriate for use in public hospital assessments, policy- and decision-making and the assurance of value for money.

Indexed as

Data envelopment analysisGulf countriesPublic hospitalsStochastic frontier analysisSystematic reviewTechnical efficiency

Identifiers

PMID31406487
PMCPMC6685225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.