ReviewCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2019
Systematic review and meta-analysis of public hospital efficiency studies in Gulf region and selected countries in similar settings.
Review in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Determinants of private health insurance uptake and its association with healthcare utilization in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: a systematic review.Global health action · 2026Pooled it
- Approach in inputs & outputs selection of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) efficiency measurement in hospitals: A systematic review.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Hospital efficiency in the eastern mediterranean region: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- Three decades in healthcare service efficiency evaluation: a bootstrapping Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) of Ministry of Health Malaysia.Health economics review · 2025Article
- Article
- Hospital performance evaluation models: A scoping review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Review
- Resource allocation efficiency in 68 county-level traditional Chinese medicine hospitals in China: a data envelopment analysis.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Efficiency and Resource Allocation in Government Hospitals in Saudi Arabi: A Casemix Index Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Changes in productivity in healthcare services in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2022Article
- Factors Influencing the Efficiency of Public Hospitals in Saudi Arabia: A Qualitative Study Exploring Stakeholders' Perspectives and Suggestions for Improvement.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Article
- Efficiency and Productivity Change of Public Hospitals in Panama: Do Management Schemes Matter?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Determinants of Technical Efficiency in Public Hospitals: The Case of Saudi Arabia.Health economics review · 2020Article
- Efficiency evaluation of public hospitals in Saudi Arabia: an application of data envelopment analysis.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Correction to: Systematic review and meta-analysis of public hospital efficiency studies in Gulf region and selected countries in similar settings.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/EArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe assessment of hospital efficiency is attracting interest worldwide, particularly in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. The objective of this study was to review the literature on public hospital efficiency and synthesise the findings in GCC countries and comparable settings.
methodsWe systematically searched six scientific databases, references and grey literature for studies that measured the efficiency of public hospitals in appropriate countries, and followed PRISMA guidelines to present the results. We summarised the included studies in terms of samples, methods/technologies and findings, then assessed their quality. We meta-analysed the efficiency estimates using Spearman's rank correlations and logistic regression, to examine the internal validity of the findings.
resultsWe identified and meta-analysed 22 of 1128 studies. Four studies were conducted in GCC nations, 18 came from Iran and Turkey. The pooled technical-efficiency (TE) was 0.792 (SE ± 0.03). There were considerable variations in model specification, analysis orientation and variables used in the studies, which influenced efficiency estimates. The studies lacked some elements required in quality appraisal, achieving an average of 73%. Meta-analysis showed negative correlations between sample size and efficiency scores; the odd ratio was 0.081 (CI 0.005: 1.300; P value = 0.07) at 10% risk level. The choice of model orientation was significantly influenced (82%) by the studied countries' income categories, which was compatible with the strategic plans of these countries.
conclusionsThe studies showed methodological and qualitative deficiencies that limited their credibility. Our review suggested that methodology and assumption choices have a substantial impact on efficiency measurements. Given the GCC countries' strategic plans and resource allocations, these nations need further efficiency research using high-quality data, different orientations and developed models. This will establish an evidence-based knowledge base appropriate for use in public hospital assessments, policy- and decision-making and the assurance of value for money.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.