Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31406338›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2019

Testing adaptive hypotheses of alloparenting in Agta foragers.

Abigail E Page, Matthew G Thomas, Daniel Smith, Mark Dyble, Sylvain Viguier, Nikhil Chaudhary, Gul Deniz Salali, James Thompson, Ruth Mace, Andrea B Migliano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Demography of grandmothering: a case study in Agta foragers.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Shodagor women cooperate across domains of work and childcare to solve an adaptive problem.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Dynamics of cooperative networks associated with gender among South Indian Tamils.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Kin networks and opportunities for reproductive cooperation and conflict among hunter-gatherers.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Sedentarization and maternal childcare networks: role of risk, gender and demography.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Thriving together: the benefits of women's social ties for physical, psychological and relationship health.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Wealth, health and inequality in Agta foragers.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abigail E PageDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. abigail.page@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0973-1569
Matthew G ThomasDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2288-1104
Daniel SmithBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6467-2023
Mark DybleDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6861-1631
Sylvain ViguierDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, London, UK.
Nikhil ChaudharyDepartment of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7528-8529
Gul Deniz SalaliDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9538-3064
James ThompsonDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, London, UK.
Ruth MaceDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6137-7739
Andrea B MiglianoDepartment of Anthropology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-2735

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P014216/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human children are frequently cared for by non-parental caregivers (alloparents), yet few studies have conducted systematic alternative hypothesis tests of why alloparents help. Here we explore whether predictions from kin selection, reciprocity, learning-to-mother and costly signalling hypotheses explain non-parental childcare among Agta hunter-gatherers from the Philippines. To test these hypotheses, we used high-resolution proximity data from 1,701 child-alloparent dyads. Our results indicated that reciprocity and relatedness were positively associated with the number of interactions with a child (our proxy for childcare). Need appeared more influential in close kin, suggesting indirect benefits, while reciprocity proved to be a stronger influence in non-kin, pointing to direct benefits. However, despite shared genes, close and distant kin interactions were also contingent on reciprocity. Compared with other apes, humans are unique in rapidly producing energetically demanding offspring. Our results suggest that the support that mothers require is met through support based on kinship and reciprocity.

Indexed as

CaregiversChild CareParentingParentsAdolescentAdultAgedAnthropology, CulturalChildChild, PreschoolCooperative BehaviorFamilyFemaleHumansInfantMale

Identifiers

PMID31406338
PMCPMC6858278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.