ArticleScientific reports2019
Three dimensional structures of putative, primitive proteins to investigate the origin of homochirality.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of the Addition of the Fifth Amino Acid to [GADV]-Protein on the Three-Dimensional Structure.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- In Planta, In Vitro and In Silico Studies of ChiralInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- The Unexplored Importance of Fleeting Chiral Intermediates in Enzyme-Catalyzed Reactions.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2021Article
- Structural Characterization of EnpA D,L-Endopeptidase fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Chiroptical activity of hydroxycarboxylic acids with implications for the origin of biological homochirality.Communications chemistry · 2021Article
- Random Coils of Proteins Situated Between a Beta Strand and an Alpha Helix Demonstrate Decreased Solvent Accessibility.The protein journal · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primitive proteins are likely to have been constructed from non-enzymatically generated amino acids, due to the weak enzymatic activities of primitive biomolecules such as ribozymes. On the other hand, almost all present proteins are constructed only from L-amino acids. Therefore, there must have been a mechanism early in the origins of life that selected for one of the optical isomers of amino acids. In this study, we used molecular dynamics simulations to predict the three-dimensional structures of the putative primitive proteins constructed only from glycine, alanine, aspartic acid, and valine ([GADV]-peptides). The [GADV]-peptides were generated computationally at random from L-amino acids (L-[GADV]-peptides) and from both L- and D-amino acids (DL-[GADV]-peptides). The results indicate that the tendency of secondary structure formation for L-[GADV]-peptides was larger than that for DL-[GADV]-peptides, and L-[GADV]-peptides were more rigid than DL-[GADV]-peptides. These results suggest that the proteins with rigid structure motifs were more prone to have been generated in a primordial soup that included only L-amino acids than a the soup including racemic amino acids. The tendency of the rigid structure motif formation may have played a role in selecting for the homochirality that dominates life on Earth today.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.