Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31406214›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Enrichment of intracellular sulphur cycle -associated bacteria in intertidal benthic foraminifera revealed by 16S and aprA gene analysis.

I S Salonen, P -M Chronopoulou, C Bird, G -J Reichart, K A Koho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Denitrification in foraminifera has an ancient origin and is complemented by associated bacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

I S SalonenUniversity of Helsinki, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Ecosystems and Environment Research Program, P.O. Box 65 (Viikinkaari 1), FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. iines.salonen@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4951-9319
P -M ChronopoulouUniversity of Helsinki, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Ecosystems and Environment Research Program, P.O. Box 65 (Viikinkaari 1), FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
C BirdUniversity of Stirling, Biological and Environmental Sciences, FK9 ALA, Stirling, United Kingdom.
G -J ReichartDepartment of Ocean Systems, NIOZ-Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research and Utrecht University, Den Burg, The Netherlands.
K A KohoUniversity of Helsinki, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Ecosystems and Environment Research Program, P.O. Box 65 (Viikinkaari 1), FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Stirling · GBUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Benthic foraminifera are known to play an important role in marine carbon and nitrogen cycles. Here, we report an enrichment of sulphur cycle -associated bacteria inside intertidal benthic foraminifera (Ammonia sp. (T6), Haynesina sp. (S16) and Elphidium sp. (S5)), using a metabarcoding approach targeting the 16S rRNA and aprA -genes. The most abundant intracellular bacterial groups included the genus Sulfurovum and the order Desulfobacterales. The bacterial 16S OTUs are likely to originate from the sediment bacterial communities, as the taxa found inside the foraminifera were also present in the sediment. The fact that 16S rRNA and aprA -gene derived intracellular bacterial OTUs were species-specific and significantly different from the ambient sediment community implies that bacterivory is an unlikely scenario, as benthic foraminifera are known to digest bacteria only randomly. Furthermore, these foraminiferal species are known to prefer other food sources than bacteria. The detection of sulphur-cycle related bacterial genes in this study suggests a putative role for these bacteria in the metabolism of the foraminiferal host. Future investigation into environmental conditions under which transcription of S-cycle genes are activated would enable assessment of their role and the potential foraminiferal/endobiont contribution to the sulphur-cycle.

Indexed as

BacteroidaceaeCampylobacterDeltaproteobacteriaDNA, BacterialDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEpsilonproteobacteriaForaminiferaGammaproteobacteriaGeologic SedimentsNorth SeaPhylogenyPrincipal Component AnalysisRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSeawaterSerine EndopeptidasesSulfurDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSerine EndopeptidasesSulfur

Identifiers

PMID31406214
PMCPMC6690927
OpenAlexW2968936743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.