Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31405877›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2019

Connecting People With Multimorbidity to Interprofessional Teams Using Telemedicine.

Pauline Pariser, Thuy-Nga Tia Pham, Judith B Brown, Moira Stewart, Jocelyn Charles

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Patient-centred innovation for multimorbidity care: a mixed-methods, randomised trial and qualitative study of the patients' experience.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Precision Health Care Elements, Definitions, and Strategies for Patients with Diabetes: A Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Pauline PariserDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Thuy-Nga Tia PhamDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Judith B BrownCentre for Studies in Family Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Moira StewartCentre for Studies in Family Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Jocelyn CharlesDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Jocelyn.charles@sunnybrook.ca.
Centre for Family Medicine · CAEast Wellington Family Health Team · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CAUniversity Health Network · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMost models for managing chronic disease focus on single diseases. Managing patients with multimorbidity is an increasing challenge in family medicine. We evaluated the feasibility of a novel approach to caring for patients with multimorbidity, performing a case study of TIP-Telemedicine IMPACT (Interprofessional Model of Practice for Aging and Complex Treatments) Plus-a 1-time interprofessional consultation with primary care physicians (PCPs) and their patients in Toronto, Canada.

methodsWe assessed feasibility of the TIP model from the number of referrals from PCPs and emergency departments in Toronto, Canada; the intervention cost; and the satisfaction of patients, PCPs, and team members with the new model. One patient and PCP story highlights the model's impact. We also performed thematic analysis of written feedback.

resultsA total of 76 patients were referred from 53 PCPs and 4 emergency departments, and 65 PCPs participated in TIP. All 74 patient survey respondents indicated TIP improved their access to interdisciplinary resources, and 97% reported feeling hopeful their conditions would improve as a result. Of 21 PCP survey respondents, 100% reported they would use TIP again, and 90% reported improved confidence in managing their patient's care. Of 87 team member survey respondents, 97% rated TIP as effective. Qualitative findings indicated benefits to both patients and health professionals. The cost was about 22% less than that of a 1-day hospital admission through the emergency department (C$854 vs C$1,088).

conclusionsTIP is a feasible intervention in multiple primary care settings that gives patients an active role in their health management, supported by their team. The model effectively addresses the needs of the most complex patients and their PCPs.

Indexed as

TelemedicineAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelCanadaEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMultiple Chronic ConditionsPatient ParticipationPatient PreferencePhysician-Patient RelationsPhysicians, Primary CarePrimary Health CareSurveys and Questionnairescare coordinationchronic diseasehealth care teamhealth care usehealth information technologyintegrated careinterdisciplinary health teaminterprofessional relationsmultimorbiditypatient-centered carepractice-based researchprimary caretelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID31405877
PMCPMC6827667
OpenAlexW2967852131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.