Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31405810›Full record

ReviewJournal of optometry

Advances in diagnostic applications for monitoring intraocular pressure in Glaucoma: A review.

Irene Sanchez, Raul Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of optometry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Irene SanchezUniversidad de Valladolid, Departamento de Física Teórica, Atómica y Óptica, Paseo de Belén, 7, Campus Miguel Delibes, Valladolid 47011, Spain; Universidad de Valladolid, Instituto Universitario de Oftalmobiología Aplicada (IOBA), Paseo de Belén, 17, Campus Miguel Delibes, Valladolid 47011, Spain; Optometry Research Group, IOBA Eye Institute, School of Optometry, University of Valladolid, Valladolid 47011, Spain. Electronic address: isanchezp@ioba.med.uva.es.
Raul MartinUniversidad de Valladolid, Departamento de Física Teórica, Atómica y Óptica, Paseo de Belén, 7, Campus Miguel Delibes, Valladolid 47011, Spain; Universidad de Valladolid, Instituto Universitario de Oftalmobiología Aplicada (IOBA), Paseo de Belén, 17, Campus Miguel Delibes, Valladolid 47011, Spain; Optometry Research Group, IOBA Eye Institute, School of Optometry, University of Valladolid, Valladolid 47011, Spain; School of Health Professions, Plymouth University, Plymouth PL68BH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous intraocular pressure (IOP) monitoring for improving glaucoma diagnosis and treatment has remained a challenge for the past 60 years because glaucoma is the second leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. Several devices with different measurement principles and recently developed biosensors with semiconductor materials offer exciting properties. However, none of these devices for continuous IOP monitoring have been fully integrated into clinical practice, primarily due to technical problems. This review summarizes state-of-the-art biosensors developed for IOP monitoring by explaining their basic functions and applications, the main technology (pressure transductors, piezoresistive sensors, capacitive sensors, and resonant sensors), measurement approach (noninvasive, minimally invasive or invasive (surgically implantable)), and telemetry characteristics. To provide updated information for clinicians and researchers, we also describe the advantages and limitations of the application of these new sensors to eye care management. Despite significant improvements in IOP biosensor technology, the accuracy of their measurements must be improved to obtain a clear equivalence with actual IOP (measured in units of mmHg) to facilitate their clinical application. In addition, telemetry systems may be simplified to prevent adverse outcomes for patients and to guarantee the safety of stored data.

Indexed as

Monitoring, PhysiologicEquipment DesignGlaucomaHumansIntraocular PressureProstheses and ImplantsTelemetryContact lens sensorGlaucoma monitoringGlaucoma sensorsIntraocular pressure sensorMonitoring intraocular pressureSeguimiento de la presión intraocularSensor de la presión intraocularSensor de lentes de contactoSensores del glaucomaSupervisión del glaucoma

Identifiers

PMID31405810
PMCPMC6978552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.