Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31405386›Full record

ArticleAIDS research and therapy2019

Social barriers in accessing care by clients who returned to HIV care after transient loss to follow-up.

Babatunde Adelekan, Nifarta Andrew, Iboro Nta, Asabe Gomwalk, Nicaise Ndembi, Charles Mensah, Patrick Dakum, Ahmad Aliyu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS research and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Babatunde AdelekanInstitute of Human Virology, Nigeria (IHVN), Abuja, Nigeria. tundeadelekan1@gmail.com.
Nifarta AndrewInstitute of Human Virology, Nigeria (IHVN), Abuja, Nigeria.
Iboro NtaInstitute of Human Virology, Nigeria (IHVN), Abuja, Nigeria.
Asabe GomwalkInstitute of Human Virology, Nigeria (IHVN), Abuja, Nigeria.
Nicaise NdembiInstitute of Human Virology, Nigeria (IHVN), Abuja, Nigeria.
Charles MensahInstitute of Human Virology, Nigeria (IHVN), Abuja, Nigeria.
Patrick DakumInstitute of Human Virology, Nigeria (IHVN), Abuja, Nigeria.
Ahmad AliyuInstitute of Human Virology, Nigeria (IHVN), Abuja, Nigeria.

Funding

PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople living with HIV (PLHIV) constantly need to address social issues such as the cost of accessing care, stigma, and lack of social support which impacts on their level of adherence to clinic visits or antiretroviral treatment leading to adverse health outcomes. This study examined the social barriers in accessing care by clients who returned to care after transient loss to follow-up.

methodsThis study was a cross-sectional survey of PLHIV from 99 US CDC PEPFAR-supported HIV clinics located in 10 of Nigeria's 36 states and Federal Capital Territory, who were momentarily lost to follow-up but returned to care after tracking. Demographic and social factors at bivariate and multivariate level were analyzed to determine the predictors of difficulty in accessing HIV clinics.

resultsOf the 7483 clients tracked, 1386 (18.5%) were confirmed to be in care, 2846 (38.2%) were lost to follow-up (LTFU), 562 (7.5%) returned to care, 843 (11.2%) discontinued care, 827 (11.1%) transferred out to other facilities for care, 514 (6.8%) had died while 505 (6.7%) could not be reached by phone or located at their addresses. 438 out of the 562 (78%) returnee PLHIV gave consent and participated in the study. 216 out of the 438 (50%) clients who returned to care were transiently lost to follow-up because they had difficulty accessing their HIV clinic. Also, 126/438 (29%) of returnee PLHIV were previously lost to follow-up. Difficult access to a HIV clinic was significantly influenced by prior LTFU (OR 2.5 [95% CI 1.3-4.8], p = 0.008), history of being stigmatized (OR 2.1 [95% CI 1.1-3.8], p = 0.02), lack of social or financial support (OR 2.8 [95% CI 1.3-6.0], p = 0.01) and perceived in-adequate healthcare workers support (OR 3.8 [95% CI 1.2-11.2], p = 0.02). Age (p = 0.218) and gender (p = 0.771) were not significant determinants of difficult access to an HIV clinic.

conclusionStigma, lack of support and prior loss to follow-up event are essential factors affecting retention in care. Social constructs such as home-based visits, community-based care services, transportation subsidies, and robust strong social systems should be built into HIV service delivery models to improve retention in care of people on HIV treatment. The authors advocate for further studies on how differentiated care models impact on retention of patients in care.

Indexed as

Lost to Follow-UpSocial SupportAgedAnti-Retroviral AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Services AccessibilityHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNigeriaSocial StigmaSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Retroviral AgentsAnti-retroviral therapy (ART)HIVLoss to follow-up (LTFU)NigeriaPLHIVSocial barriers

Identifiers

PMID31405386
PMCPMC6691550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.