Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31405365›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2019

Effect of deep tissue laser therapy treatment on peripheral neuropathic pain in older adults with type 2 diabetes: a pilot randomized clinical trial.

Prasun Chatterjee, Achal K Srivastava, Deepa A Kumar, Avinash Chakrawarty, Maroof A Khan, Akash K Ambashtha, Vijay Kumar, Luis De Taboada, Aparajit B Dey

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prasun ChatterjeeDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. drprasun.geriatrics@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3260-2458
Achal K SrivastavaDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Deepa A KumarDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Avinash ChakrawartyDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Maroof A KhanDepartment of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Akash K AmbashthaHealth World Hospital, Durgapur, West Bengal, India.
Vijay KumarDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Luis De TaboadaLiteCure LLC, Carlsbad, CA, USA.
Aparajit B DeyDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study assessed the safety and efficacy of deep tissue laser therapy on the management of pain, functionality, systemic inflammation, and overall quality of life of older adults with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

methodsThe effects of deep tissue laser therapy (DTLT) were assessed in a randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled, interventional trial. Forty participants were randomized (1:1) to receive either DTLT or sham laser therapy (SLT). In addition to the standard-of-care treatment, participants received either DTLT or SLT twice weekly for 4 weeks and then once weekly for 8 weeks (a 12-week intervention period). The two treatments were identical, except that laser emission was disabled during SLT. Assessments for pain, functionality, serum levels of inflammatory biomarkers, and quality of life (QOL) were performed at baseline and after the 12-week intervention period. The results from the two treatments were compared using ANOVA in a pre-test-post-test design.

resultsAll participants randomized to the DTLT group and 85% (17 of 20) of participants randomized to the SLT group completed the trial. No significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups were observed. After the 12-week intervention period, pain levels significantly decreased in both groups and were significantly lower in the DTLT group than in the SLT group. The Timed Up and Go test times (assessing functionality) were significantly improved in both groups and were 16% shorter in the DTLT group than in the SLT group. Serum levels of IL-6 decreased significantly in both groups. Additionally, serum levels of MCP-1 decreased significantly in the DTLT group but not in the SLT group. Patients' quality of life improved significantly in the DTLT group but not in the SLT group.

conclusionsDeep tissue laser therapy significantly reduced pain and improved the quality of life of older patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

trial registrationClinical Trial Registry-India CTRI/2017/06/008739 . [Registered on: 02/06/2017]. The trial was registered retrospectively.

Indexed as

AgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Double-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIndiaLaser TherapyMaleMiddle AgedNeuralgiaPain MeasurementPilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDeep tissue laser therapyDiabetic peripheral neuropathyInflammatory markersOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID31405365
PMCPMC6689877
OpenAlexW2967000731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.