Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31404807›Full record

ArticleHearing research2019

Ecological cocktail party listening reveals the utility of extended high-frequency hearing.

Brian B Monson, Jenna Rock, Anneliese Schulz, Elissa Hoffman, Emily Buss

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The role of talker sex and physical dimensions in horizontal speech directivity.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025
    Article
  3. An Anechoic, High-Fidelity, Multidirectional Speech Corpus.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hearing in categories aids speech streaming at the "cocktail party".bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian B MonsonDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States; Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States. Electronic address: monson@illinois.edu.
Jenna RockDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States.
Anneliese SchulzDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States.
Elissa HoffmanDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States.
Emily BussDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

DEVELOPMENT AND PLASTICITY IN NORMAL AND IMPAIRED EARSR01DC000397 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSS, EMILY · 1988 to 2016
$5.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental principle of neuroscience is that each species' and individual's sensory systems are tailored to meet the demands placed upon them by their environments and experiences. What has driven the upper limit of the human frequency range of hearing? The traditional view is that sensitivity to the highest frequencies (i.e., beyond 8 kHz) facilitates localization of sounds in the environment. However, this has yet to be demonstrated for naturally occurring non-speech sounds. An alternative view is that, for social species such as humans, the biological relevance of conspecific vocalizations has driven the development and retention of auditory system features. Here, we provide evidence for the latter theory. We evaluated the contribution of extended high-frequency (EHF) hearing to common ecological speech perception tasks. We found that restricting access to EHFs reduced listeners' discrimination of talker head orientation by approximately 34%. Furthermore, access to EHFs significantly improved speech recognition under listening conditions in which the target talker's head was facing the listener while co-located background talkers faced away from the listener. Our findings raise the possibility that sensitivity to the highest audio frequencies fosters communication and socialization of the human species. These findings suggest that loss of sensitivity to the highest frequencies may lead to deficits in speech perception. Such EHF hearing loss typically goes undiagnosed, but is widespread among the middle-aged population.

Indexed as

HearingPerceptual MaskingSpeech PerceptionAdultComprehensionFemaleHumansMaleNoiseRecognition, PsychologySpeech IntelligibilityYoung AdultCocktail party problemHigh frequency hearingSpeech perception

Identifiers

PMID31404807
PMCPMC6860371
OpenAlexW2965908282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.