Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31404421›Full record

ReviewRegenerative biomaterials2019

Cardiac tissue-derived extracellular matrix scaffolds for myocardial repair: advantages and challenges.

Pawan Kc, Yi Hong, Ge Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Regenerative biomaterials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pawan KcDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Akron, Olson Research Center, Room 301L, 260 S Forge Street, Akron, OH, USA.
Yi HongDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Arlington, 500 UTA Blvd, Room 240, Arlington, TX, USA.
Ge ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Akron, Olson Research Center, Room 301L, 260 S Forge Street, Akron, OH, USA.

Funding

Bioactive injectable blends for cardiac stem cell recruitmentR15HL140503 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ARLINGTON · PI HONG, YI · 2018 to 2018
$460k
Reinforce Cell Sheets with Acellular Porcine Myocardial Scaffolds: Application in Cardiac RepairR15HL122949 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF AKRON · PI ZHANG, GE · 2015 to 2015
$460k
NHLBI NIH HHS R15 HL122949NHLBI NIH HHS R15 HL140503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) derived from myocardium has been widely explored as a nature scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering applications. Cardiac dECM offers many unique advantages such as preservation of organ-specific ECM microstructure and composition, demonstration of tissue-mimetic mechanical properties and retention of biochemical cues in favor of subsequent recellularization. However, current processes of dECM decellularization and recellularization still face many challenges including the need for balance between cell removal and extracellular matrix preservation, efficient recellularization of dECM for obtaining homogenous cell distribution, tailoring material properties of dECM for enhancing bioactivity and prevascularization of thick dECM. This review summarizes the recent progresses of using dECM scaffold for cardiac repair and discusses its major advantages and challenges for producing biomimetic cardiac patch.

Indexed as

cardiac tissue engineeringdecellularized extracellular matrixmyocardial infarctionscaffold

Identifiers

PMID31404421
PMCPMC6683951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.