Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31404416›Full record

ReviewJournal of pediatric intensive care2019

Apneic Oxygenation for Pediatric Endotracheal Intubation: A Narrative Review.

Alice Scott, Olivia Chua, William Mitchell, Ruan Vlok, Thomas Melhuish, Leigh White

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pediatric intensive care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05028023 (Effects of Apneic Oxygenation in Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation rSO2 During Tracheal Dilatation Procedures in Pediatric Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05028023 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Apneic Oxygenation in Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation rSO2 During Tracheal Dilatation Procedures in Pediatric Patients (With Acquired Tracheal Stenosis). Innovation and Safety of the Technique

TypeinterventionalSponsorAristotle University Of ThessalonikiRan2020 to 2022Enrolled5ConditionsApnea+Hypopnea, Tracheal Dilatation, Igel, Tracheal StenosisArmsApneic oxygenation - supplemental high flow oxygen administration by an apneic way
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Paediatric Life Support].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alice ScottResident Medical Officer, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Olivia ChuaResident Medical Officer, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
William MitchellResident Medical Officer, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2122-6741
Ruan VlokResident Medical Officer, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Thomas MelhuishDepartment of Intensive Care, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Leigh WhiteSunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Australia.
Royal North Shore Hospital · AUPrince of Wales Hospital · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUSunshine Coast University Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apneic oxygenation (ApOx) has shown to be effective in adult populations in a variety of settings, including prehospital, emergency departments, intensive care units, and elective surgery. This review aims to assess the available literature for ApOx in the pediatric population to determine its effects on hypoxemia, safe apnea times, and flow rates employed safely.

Indexed as

apneicICUintubationoxygenationpediatric

Identifiers

PMID31404416
PMCPMC6687453
OpenAlexW2914078745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.