ReviewJournal of pediatric intensive care2019
Apneic Oxygenation for Pediatric Endotracheal Intubation: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of pediatric intensive care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05028023 (Effects of Apneic Oxygenation in Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation rSO2 During Tracheal Dilatation Procedures in Pediatric Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Apneic Oxygenation in Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation rSO2 During Tracheal Dilatation Procedures in Pediatric Patients (With Acquired Tracheal Stenosis). Innovation and Safety of the Technique
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Low-flow oxygen delivery using a nasal cannula for apnoeic oxygenation in children undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2023Article
- Apneic oxygenation with low-flow oxygen cannula for rapid sequence induction and intubation in pediatric patients: a randomized-controlled trial.Translational pediatrics · 2022Article
- [Paediatric Life Support].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Apneic oxygenation (ApOx) has shown to be effective in adult populations in a variety of settings, including prehospital, emergency departments, intensive care units, and elective surgery. This review aims to assess the available literature for ApOx in the pediatric population to determine its effects on hypoxemia, safe apnea times, and flow rates employed safely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.