ArticleHuman and ecological risk assessment : HERA2019
Methods for evaluating variability in human health dose-response characterization.
Article in Human and ecological risk assessment : HERA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vitamin D as an Immuno-Endocrine Modulator: Discovering Its Role in Autoimmune Disorders and Host Defense Mechanisms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Oral and cardiometabolic health through the lens of biobanks and large-scale epidemiologic research.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
- The Effects of a Parental Behavior Modification Program to Prevent Pesticide Exposure Among Toddlers Living in Agricultural Areas of Thailand: An Experimental Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Incorporating new approach methods (NAMs) data in dose-response assessments: The future is now!Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2025Review
- Intersubject variability in a comprehensive numerical assessment of operator electromagnetic exposure to TMS.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- G × E interactions as a basis for toxicological uncertainty.Archives of toxicology · 2023Article
- Current practice and recommendations for advancing how human variability and susceptibility are considered in chemical risk assessment.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2023Review
- Application of probabilistic methods to address variability and uncertainty in estimating risks for non-cancer health effects.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2023Article
- A Two-Pronged Educational Intervention for Caregivers to Prevent Residential Pesticide Exposure Among Thai Young Children Living in Agricultural Area.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- Conducting evaluations of evidence that are transparent, timely and can lead to health-protective actions.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2022Article
- Article
- The effects of geochemical processes on groundwater chemistry and the health risks associated with fluoride intake in a semi-arid region of South India.RSC advances · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The Reference Dose (RfD) and Reference Concentration (RfC) are human health reference values (RfVs) representing exposure concentrations at or below which there is presumed to be little risk of adverse effects in the general human population. The 2009 National Research Council report
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.