Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31404243›Full record

ArticleJournal of nonverbal behavior2019

What Basic Emotion Theory Really Says for the Twenty-First Century Study of Emotion.

Dacher Keltner, Jessica L Tracy, Disa Sauter, Alan Cowen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nonverbal behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The emotional life of animals.Cognition & emotion · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Structural neuroanatomy of human facial behaviors.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Loneliness and Mode of Social Contact in Late Life.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Emotion Regulation in Couples Across Adulthood.Annual review of developmental psychology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dacher KeltnerDepartment of Psychology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9061-5292
Jessica L TracyUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, USA.
Disa SauterUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alan CowenDepartment of Psychology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING CONSORTIUM IN AFFECTIVE SCIENCET32MH020006 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI GROSS, JAMES J, JOHNSON, SHERI L · 1998 to 2018
$5.9M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basic emotion theory (BET) has been, perhaps, the central narrative in the science of emotion. As Crivelli and Fridlund (J Nonverbal Behav 125:1-34, 2019, this issue) would have it, however, BET is ready to be put to rest, facing "last stands" and "fatal" empirical failures. Nothing could be further from the truth. Crivelli and Fridlund's outdated treatment of BET, narrow focus on facial expressions of six emotions, inattention to robust empirical literatures, and overreliance on singular "critical tests" of a multifaceted theory, undermine their critique and belie the considerable advances guided by basic emotion theory.

Indexed as

Basic emotionFacial expressionVocal expression

Identifiers

PMID31404243
PMCPMC6688640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.