Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31404117›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Evaluation of novel disposable bioreactors on pandemic influenza virus production.

Chia-Chun Lai, Tsai-Chuan Weng, Yu-Fen Tseng, Jen-Ron Chiang, Min-Shi Lee, Alan Yung-Chih Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cells · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. EnhancingVaccines · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chia-Chun LaiNational Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan.
Tsai-Chuan WengNational Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan.
Yu-Fen TsengNational Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan.
Jen-Ron ChiangVaccine Center, Centers for Disease Control, Taipei, Taiwan.
Min-Shi LeeNational Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan.
Alan Yung-Chih HuNational Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4501-8645

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 1997, the highly pathogenic influenza H5N1 virus has spread from Hong Kong. According to the WHO bulletin report, the H5N1 virus is a zoonotic disease threat that has infected more than 850 humans, causing over 450 deaths. In addition, an outbreak of another new and highly pathogenic influenza virus (H7N9) occurred in 2013 in China. These highly pathogenic influenza viruses could potentially cause a worldwide pandemic. it is crucial to develop a rapid production platform to meet this surge demand against any possible influenza pandemic. A potential solution for this problem is the use of cell-based bioreactors for rapid vaccine production. These novel bioreactors, used for cell-based vaccine production, possess various advantages. For example, they enable a short production time, allow for the handling highly pathogenic influenza in closed environments, and can be easily scaled up. In this study, two novel disposable cell-based bioreactors, BelloCell and TideCell, were used to produce H5N1 clade II and H7N9 candidate vaccine viruses (CVVs). Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells were used for the production of these influenza CVVs. A novel bench-scale bioreactor named BelloCell bioreactor was used in the study. All culturing conditions were tested and scaled to 10 L industrial-scale bioreactor known as TideCell002. The performances of between BelloCell and TideCell were similar in cell growth, the average MDCK cell doubling time was slightly decreased to 25 hours. The systems yielded approximately 39.2 and 18.0 μg/ml of HA protein with the 10-liter TideCell002 from the H5N1 clade II and H7N9 CVVs, respectively. The results of this study not only highlight the overall effectiveness of these bioreactors but also illustrate the potential of maintaining the same outcome when scaled up to industrial production, which has many implications for faster vaccine production. Although additional studies are required for process optimization, the results of this study are promising and show that oscillating bioreactors may be a suitable platform for pandemic influenza virus production.

Indexed as

BioreactorsDisposable EquipmentAnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsDogsHumansInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H7N9 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMadin Darby Canine Kidney CellsPandemicsVero CellsInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID31404117
PMCPMC6690526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.