ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2020
Haemostatic responsiveness and release of biological response modifiers following cryopreservation of platelets treated with amotosalen and ultraviolet A light.
Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Practices in platelet production: A Nordic perspective (2018-2022).Vox sanguinis · 2026Article
- Cryopreserved Platelets in a Non-Toxic DMSO-Free Solution Maintain Hemostatic Function In Vitro.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Cryopreserved platelets and amotosalen-treated plasma in an experimental clot formation set-up.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2023Article
- Platelet Transfusion-Insights from Current Practice to Future Development.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Cryopreservation of buffy coat derived platelets: Paired in vitro characterization using uncontrolled versus controlled freezing rate protocols.Transfusion · 2021Article
- Platelet Biochemistry and Morphology after Cryopreservation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to the risk of replication of contaminating pathogens, platelets have a limited storage time of 5 days, which can be prolonged to 7 days by the use of pathogen inactivation technologies. Cryopreservation (CP) may be an alternative to permit longer storage periods and increased availability. However, the preparation of platelets can result in secretion of biological response modifiers (BRM), which can cause adverse transfusion reactions in the recipient. We investigated the impact of CP on platelet function and release of BRM in untreated (conventional) and pathogen-inactivated (PI) platelet concentrates. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwelve buffy coat-derived platelet units were treated with amotosalen and ultraviolet A light to inactivate pathogens. Twelve untreated units were used as controls. The 24 units were cryopreserved and in vitro variables were analysed before and after CP. The in vitro variables investigated included platelet surface receptors and activation markers by flow cytometry, and coagulation time by viscoelastography. A panel of BRM, including cytokines, was investigated.
resultsCP of both conventional and PI platelets resulted in a significant increase of BRM with similar increases of most of the BRM after CP of conventional and PI platelet concentrates. The increase in some of the BRM correlated significantly with shortened coagulation time, increased P-selectin expression, reduced mitochondrial transmembrane potential, and reduced capacity to respond to stimulation with ADP and collagen. DISCUSSION: Cryopreservation of both conventional and PI platelets results in secretion of BRM. The increase in some of the BRM correlated with changes in platelet function variables and suggests that BRM release is affected, in part, in a similar way by CP as are changes in platelet function variables. PI with amotosalen and ultraviolet A light in combination with CP did not affect the release of immunomodulatory factors more than CP alone did.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.