Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31403820›Full record

ArticleHuman factors2020

Effects of Initial Starting Distance and Gap Characteristics on Children's and Young Adults' Velocity Regulation When Intercepting Moving Gaps.

Hyun Chae Chung, Gyoojae Choi, Muhammad Azam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human factors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hyun Chae ChungKunsan National University, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6322-8120
Gyoojae ChoiKunsan National University, Republic of Korea.
Muhammad AzamKunsan National University, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1464-2595

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study investigated how children and young adults regulate their velocity when crossing roads under varying traffic conditions.

backgroundTo cross roads safely, pedestrians must adapt their movements to the moving vehicles around them while tightly coupling their movement to visual information.

methodUsing an Oculus Rift, 16 children and 16 young adults walked on a treadmill and intercepted gaps between two simulated moving vehicles in an immersive virtual environment. We varied the participants' initial distance from the curb to the interception point, as well as gap characteristics, including gap size and vehicle size.

resultsVarying the initial distance led to systematic adjustments in participants' approach velocities. The inter-vehicle gap and the vehicle size affected the crossing position induced by the initial distance. However, participants did not systematically scale their positions according to the initial distance in narrow gap. Notably, children did not finely tune their movements when they approached wide gap from a closer distance or when they approached the large vehicle from closer distance.

conclusionChildren were less precise in coupling their movements to the moving vehicle in complex traffic environments. In particular, large moving vehicles approaching at closer distances can pose risks when children cross roads. APPLICATION: These findings suggest the need for an intervention program to improve children's skill in perceiving larger vehicles and timing their movements when crossing roads. We suggest using an interactive virtual reality system to practice this skill.

Indexed as

PedestriansVirtual RealityAccidents, TrafficChildHumansSafetyUser-Computer InterfaceWalkingYoung Adultcouplinggap crossingperception-actionspeedvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID31403820
PMCPMC7416330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.