Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31403814›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2019

Randomized trial of a dissonance-based transdiagnostic group treatment for eating disorders: An evaluation of target engagement.

Eric Stice, Sonja Yokum, Paul Rohde, Heather Shaw, Jeff M Gau, Sarah Johnson, Aviva Johns

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03261050 (Target Engagement of a Novel Dissonance-Based Treatment for DSM-5 Eating Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03261050 nacompletednot on this map

Target Engagement of a Novel Dissonance-Based Treatment for DSM-5 Eating Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2017 to 2025Enrolled83ConditionsEating DisorderArmsCounter Attitudinal Therapy, Interpersonal Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eric SticeOregon Research Institute.
Sonja YokumOregon Research Institute.
Paul RohdeOregon Research Institute.
Heather ShawOregon Research Institute.
Jeff M GauOregon Research Institute.
Sarah JohnsonOregon Research Institute.ORCID 0000-0002-6663-3711
Aviva JohnsDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin.

Funding

Target Engagment of a Novel Dissonance-Based Treatment for DSM-5 Eating Disorders.R33MH111782 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STICE, ERIC M · 2019 to 2023
$2.4M
Target Engagment of a Novel Dissonance-Based Treatment for DSM-5 Eating Disorders.R61MH111782 · NIMH · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STICE, ERIC M · 2017 to 2018
$1.3M
NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS R33 MH111782NIMH NIH HHS R61 MH111782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTest whether a dissonance-based transdiagnostic eating disorder treatment reduces valuation of the thin beauty ideal and high-calorie binge foods, the intervention targets, and eating pathology relative to waitlist controls.

methodWomen with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 eating disorders (N = 100) were randomized to an 8-week group-implemented Body Project Treatment (BPT) redesigned to encourage rapid symptom reduction or a waitlist control condition, completing functional MRI paradigms assessing neural response to thin models and binge foods, questionnaires, and diagnostic interviews at pretest and posttest.

resultsCompared to controls, BPT participants showed greater reductions in responsivity of regions involved in reward valuation (ventromedial prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, caudate) to thin models but not binge foods, pursuit of the thin ideal (d = .72), palatability ratings of binge foods (d = .78), and greater increases in attractiveness ratings of average-weight models (d = .44), the intervention targets. BPT participants also showed significantly greater reductions in body dissatisfaction (d = .83), negative affect (d = .76), and eating disorder symptoms (d = .59), and marginally greater abstinence from binge eating and compensatory behaviors (39% vs. 21%) than controls.

conclusionsResults provide novel evidence that BPT affected the hypothesized intervention targets and reduced variables that are putatively secondary to pursuit of the thin ideal, including body dissatisfaction, negative affect, and eating disorder symptoms. Symptom reductions were smaller than in past trials, suggesting that it may be optimal to reduce valuation of the thin ideal before asking participants to reduce disordered eating behaviors that are used to pursue this ideal. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Cognitive DissonanceRewardAdultCaudate NucleusFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrefrontal CortexPsychotherapy, GroupTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31403814
PMCPMC6693644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.