Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31403812›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2019

Gender differences in short-term cardiovascular effects of giving and receiving support for health concerns in marriage.

Joan K Monin, Andrew Manigault, Becca R Levy, Richard Schulz, Ajua Duker, Margaret S Clark, Peter H Van Ness, Trace Kershaw

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Social participation and marital satisfaction in mid to late life marriage.Journal of social and personal relationships · 2022
    Article
  6. Laughter and short-term blood pressure reactivity in middle-aged and older adult spousal support interactions.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joan K MoninSocial and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health.
Andrew ManigaultDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University.
Becca R LevySocial and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health.
Richard SchulzUniversity Center for Social and Urban Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh.
Ajua DukerDepartment of Psychology, Yale University.
Margaret S ClarkDepartment of Psychology, Yale University.
Peter H Van NessInternal Medicine, Geriatric Medicine, Yale School of Medicine.
Trace KershawSocial and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health.
Yale University · USOhio University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Albert C Shaw · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Culture-Gene Relationship: A Novel Model of Aging Cognitive HealthU01AG032284 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LEVY, BECCA R · 2017 to 2020
$1.7M
Chronic Conditions and Mutuality of Care in Late Life Marriage:A Multi-method AppK01AG042450 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MONIN, JOAN E. · 2013 to 2017
$634k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIA NIH HHS K01 AG042450NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLittle is known about the cardiovascular effects of mutual emotional spousal support given for health concerns. We examined the hypotheses that: (a) mutual support (both spouses giving and receiving support) compared to one-sided or no support, would decrease blood pressure and heart rate in both spouses during a recovery period; and (b) wives would benefit more from mutual support than would husbands. A second aim was to examine gender differences in cardiovascular reactivity, distress, and closeness in response to receiving support regardless of mutuality.

methodIn 98 married couples (Age 50+), spouses discussed health concerns and were assigned randomly to one of four conditions: neither spouse received support (n = 26), only the wife received support from the husband (n = 22), only the husband received support from the wife (n = 23), or both received support (n = 27). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were measured during baseline, the discussions, and recovery. Distress, closeness, and support were self-reported. Support quality was observationally coded.

resultsMutual support did not affect cardiovascular reactivity. When husbands received support from wives, husbands' blood pressure and distress decreased, and both partners' closeness increased. When wives received support, husbands and wives felt closer, but both partners' heart rate remained elevated and wives felt more distressed.

conclusionsReceiving support individually may be more important than receiving support mutually for older adult spouses coping with their health concerns. Also, support interventions for couples coping with health conditions should take into account that husbands receive greater benefits from spousal support than wives. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAgedCardiovascular DiseasesEmotionsFemaleGender IdentityHumansMaleMarriageMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID31403812
PMCPMC6897330
OpenAlexW2968078121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.