ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2020
Validation of sampling methods in bulk feed ingredients for detection of swine viruses.
Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of DNA extraction methods for detecting African swine fever virus in feed and environmental samples.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Biosecurity and Mitigation Strategies to Control Swine Viruses in Feed Ingredients and Complete Feeds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Detection of African Swine Fever Virus in Feed and Feed Mill Environment Following Extended Storage.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2023Article
- Developing a gateway program for importing non-animal origin ingredients from regions with African swine fever virus.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2022Article
- Effect of mixing and feed batch sequencing on the prevalence and distribution of African swine fever virus in swine feed.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2022Article
- Evidence of viral survival in representative volumes of feed and feed ingredients during long-distance commercial transport across the continental United States.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2022Article
- Survival of a surrogate African swine fever virus-like algal virus in feed matrices using a 23-day commercial United States truck transport model.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Biosecurity in pig farms: a review.Porcine health management · 2021Review
- Virus Detection: A Review of the Current and Emerging Molecular and Immunological Methods.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
- The risk of viral transmission in feed: What do we know, what do we do?Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2020Review
- Validation of sampling methods in bulk feed ingredients for detection of swine viruses.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Animal feed can be contaminated with fomites carrying swine viruses and subsequently be a vehicle for viral transmission. This contamination may not be evenly distributed, and there is no validated sampling method for detection of viruses in animal feed or ingredients. The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate the sensitivity of ingredient sampling methods for detection of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus (PEDV). No animals were used in this experiment, so approval from an animal ethics committee was not necessary. Thirteen kg soybean meal was used in a 2 × 2 factorial plus a control, with 2 doses of PEDV (Low: 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.