Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31403717›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2019

30-Day Emergency Department Revisit Rates among Older Adults with Documented Dementia.

Tyler Kent, Adriane Lesser, Juhi Israni, Ula Hwang, Christopher Carpenter, Kelly J Ko

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06273917 (Deprescribing Potentially Inappropriate Medications in the Emergency Department for Persons Living With Dementia), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06273917 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Deprescribing Potentially Inappropriate Medications in the Emergency Department for Persons Living With Dementia

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Ran2024 to 2025Enrolled300ConditionsDementiaArmsPRIDE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of interventions for persons living with dementia: The Geriatric ED Guidelines 2.0.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Detection of emergency department patients at risk of dementia through artificial intelligence.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Detection and differentiation of undiagnosed dementia in the emergency department: A pilot referral pathway.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Community paramedicine in dementia care.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tyler KentThe Gary and Mary West Health Institute, La Jolla, California.
Adriane LesserThe Gary and Mary West Health Institute, La Jolla, California.
Juhi IsraniThe Gary and Mary West Health Institute, La Jolla, California.
Ula HwangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Christopher CarpenterWashington University Division of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-2603-7157
Kelly J KoThe Gary and Mary West Health Institute, La Jolla, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPublished literature on national emergency department (ED) revisit rates among older adults with dementia is sparse, despite anecdotal evidence of higher ED utilization. Thus we evaluated the odds ratio (OR) of 30-day ED revisits among older adults with dementia using a nationally representative sample.

designWe assessed the frequency of claims associated with a 30-day ED revisit among Medicare beneficiaries with and without a dementia diagnosis before or at index ED visit. We used a logistic regression model controlling for dementia, age, sex, race, region, Medicaid status, transfer to a skilled nursing facility after ED, primary care physician use 12 months before index, and comorbidity.

settingA nationally representative sample of claims data for Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older who maintained continuous fee-for-service enrollment during 2015 and 2016. Only outpatient claims associated with an ED visit between January 2016 and November 2016 were included as a qualifying index encounter.

participantsWe identified 240 249 patients without dementia and 54 622 patients for whom a dementia code was recorded in the year before the index encounter in 2016.

resultsOur results indicate a significant difference in unadjusted 30-day ED revisit rates among those with an ED dementia diagnoses (22.0%) compared with those without (13.9%). Our adjusted results indicated that dementia is a significant predictor of 30-day ED revisits (P < .0001). Those with a dementia diagnosis at or before the index ED visit were more likely to have experienced an ED revisit within 30 days (OR = 1.27; 95% confidence interval = 1.24-1.31).

conclusionDementia diagnoses were a significant predictor of 30-day ED revisits. Further research should assess potential reasons why dementia is associated with markedly higher revisit rates, as well as opportunities to manage and transition dementia patients from the ED back to the community more effectively. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:2254-2259, 2019.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDementiaEmergency Service, HospitalFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMedicarePatient ReadmissionPatient TransferRetrospective StudiesUnited Statesdementiaemergencygeriatricrevisits

Identifiers

PMID31403717
PMCPMC6899685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.