Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31403494›Full record

ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)

AcrySof IQ PanOptix Intraocular Lens Versus Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens and Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Clinical Overview.

Rachapalle Reddi Sudhir, Arindam Dey, Shovan Bhattacharrya, Amit Bahulayan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07076277 (Visual Outcomes in Patients Contralaterally Implanted With PanOptix Pro and Clareon Vivity Compared to Bilateral Implantation of PanOptix Pro), which is not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07076277 naenrolling by invitationnot on this map

Visual Outcomes in Patients Contralaterally Implanted With PanOptix Pro and Clareon Vivity Compared to Bilateral Implantation of PanOptix Pro

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrian ShaferRan2025 to 2026Enrolled346ConditionsCataract, Multifocal Intraocular LensArmsClareon PanOptix Pro and Clareon Vivity Intraocular Lens, Clareon PanOptix Pro Intraocular Lenses
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Advances in cataract surgery: is a new era on the horizon?Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachapalle Reddi SudhirMedical Research Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Arindam DeyAlcon Laboratories (India) Private Ltd, Bangalore, India.
Shovan BhattacharryaAlcon Laboratories (India) Private Ltd, Bangalore, India.
Amit BahulayanAlcon Laboratories (India) Private Ltd, Bangalore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AcrySof IQ PanOptix Model TFNT00 (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX) is a 1-piece aspheric hydrophobic presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens (IOL) launched in 2015. Unlike traditional trifocal IOLs that usually have an intermediate focal point of 80 cm, the PanOptix IOL is designed to have an intermediate focal point of 60 cm (arms-length), a more natural and comfortable working distance to perform functional tasks on computers, laptops, mobiles, among others. The non-apodized PanOptix IOL uses the ENhanced LIGHT ENergy (ENLIGHTEN; Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX) optical technology that provides high (88%) utilization of light energy, low dependence on pupil size in all lighting conditions, and a more comfortable near-to-intermediate range of vision than traditional trifocal IOLs. This review provides an overview of the clinical performance of the PanOptix IOL and discusses it in the context of other commercially available trifocal IOLs, FineVision Micro F (PhysIOL, Liege, Belgium), the AT LISA tri 839MP (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) and the extended depth of focus IOL, TECNIS Symfony (Abbott Medical Optics, Santa Ana, CA). A literature search was performed in the PubMed database to identify studies that have assessed the visual and other clinical outcomes with the PanOptix IOL. In total, 12 studies were included in this review article. Overall, the clinical evidence suggests that in general good visual outcomes, along with a high degree of spectacle independence, are achieved in patients implanted with the PanOptix, FineVision, AT LISA and Symfony IOLs. However, every MIOL has its benefits and limitations, which along with patient's needs and clinical conditions are important factors to consider while selecting an IOL to achieve best possible post-operative outcomes.

Indexed as

Lenses, IntraocularPatient SatisfactionHumansPhacoemulsificationProsthesis DesignPseudophakiaRefraction, OcularVision, BinocularVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID31403494
PMCPMC6727923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.