ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)
AcrySof IQ PanOptix Intraocular Lens Versus Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens and Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Clinical Overview.
Review in Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07076277 (Visual Outcomes in Patients Contralaterally Implanted With PanOptix Pro and Clareon Vivity Compared to Bilateral Implantation of PanOptix Pro), which is not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Visual Outcomes in Patients Contralaterally Implanted With PanOptix Pro and Clareon Vivity Compared to Bilateral Implantation of PanOptix Pro
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of all kinds of intraocular lenses in presbyopia-correcting cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of trifocal or hybrid multifocal-extended depth of focus intraocular lenses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety analysis of LenSX and Catalys femtosecond laser systems in short axial length patients.Lasers in medical science · 2026Trial
- An exploration of safe and efficient nucleus fragmentation strategies for femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in short axial length patients.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Trial
- The REVIVE Study: Long Term Outcomes of a Novel Non-Diffractive Extended Vision IOL versus Monofocal Control IOL.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Trial
- Visual Outcomes and Patient-Reported Dysphotopsia After PanOptix and PanOptix Toric Implantation Stratified by Preoperative Chord Mu: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- A Comparative Study of the Visual Outcomes of Two Common Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lenses in a Matched Cohort.Cureus · 2026Article
- Visual and refractive outcomes of eyes with low corneal astigmatism implanted with low toric or non-toric trifocal intraocular lenses.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Advances in cataract surgery: is a new era on the horizon?Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Preliminary clinical observation of unilateral implantation of trifocal intraocular lens.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Reasons for dissatisfaction after implantation of extended depth-of-focus and trifocal intraocular lenses: a retrospective case series.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Visual outcome of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens in eyes with short axial length.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Comparison of visual performance outcomes following PanOptix and symfony ZXR00 intraocular lens implantation using the area under the distance-corrected defocus curve.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Factors Affecting Postoperative Satisfaction After Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lens.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Early Clinical Outcomes After the Mix-and-Match Approach of Trifocal and Non-Diffractive EDOF IOL.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Long Term Visual Outcomes Following Implantation of a New Hydrophobic IOL in a Real-World Clinical Setting.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of effectiveness and safety in cataract patients implanted with the novel hybrid extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens AM2UH: a prospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Binocular Reading Speed Comparison: Patients After Bilateral Trifocal IOL Implantation versus Those without Cataract -A Prospective, Dual-Center Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Comparison of Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction Between Two Trifocal Intraocular Lenses: A Prospective, Paired-Eye Comparative Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of color perception in cataract patients bilateral implanted with presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AcrySof IQ PanOptix Model TFNT00 (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX) is a 1-piece aspheric hydrophobic presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens (IOL) launched in 2015. Unlike traditional trifocal IOLs that usually have an intermediate focal point of 80 cm, the PanOptix IOL is designed to have an intermediate focal point of 60 cm (arms-length), a more natural and comfortable working distance to perform functional tasks on computers, laptops, mobiles, among others. The non-apodized PanOptix IOL uses the ENhanced LIGHT ENergy (ENLIGHTEN; Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX) optical technology that provides high (88%) utilization of light energy, low dependence on pupil size in all lighting conditions, and a more comfortable near-to-intermediate range of vision than traditional trifocal IOLs. This review provides an overview of the clinical performance of the PanOptix IOL and discusses it in the context of other commercially available trifocal IOLs, FineVision Micro F (PhysIOL, Liege, Belgium), the AT LISA tri 839MP (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) and the extended depth of focus IOL, TECNIS Symfony (Abbott Medical Optics, Santa Ana, CA). A literature search was performed in the PubMed database to identify studies that have assessed the visual and other clinical outcomes with the PanOptix IOL. In total, 12 studies were included in this review article. Overall, the clinical evidence suggests that in general good visual outcomes, along with a high degree of spectacle independence, are achieved in patients implanted with the PanOptix, FineVision, AT LISA and Symfony IOLs. However, every MIOL has its benefits and limitations, which along with patient's needs and clinical conditions are important factors to consider while selecting an IOL to achieve best possible post-operative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.