Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31403132›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2019

Non-invasive prenatal screening: A 20-year experience in Italy.

Chiara Palka, Paolo Guanciali-Franchi, Elisena Morizio, Melissa Alfonsi, Marco Papponetti, Giulia Sabbatinelli, Giandomenico Palka, Giuseppe Calabrese, Peter Benn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chiara PalkaDepartment of Medical, Oral, and Biotechnological Sciences, Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti, Italy.
Paolo Guanciali-FranchiDepartment of Medical, Oral, and Biotechnological Sciences, Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti, Italy.
Elisena MorizioDepartment of Medical, Oral, and Biotechnological Sciences, Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti, Italy.
Melissa AlfonsiMedical Genetics Unit, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy.
Marco PapponettiMedical Genetics Unit, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy.
Giulia SabbatinelliDepartment of Hematology, Pescara Hospital, Pescara, Italy.
Giandomenico PalkaDepartment of Medical, Oral, and Biotechnological Sciences, Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti, Italy.
Giuseppe CalabreseDepartment of Hematology, Pescara Hospital, Pescara, Italy.
Peter BennDepartment of Genetics and Genome Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past two decades, there has been a rapid evolution in prenatal screening for fetal chromosome abnormalities. Initially, testing was focused on the identification of affected pregnancies in either the first, or, the second trimester (e.g. the Combined test or the triple test). This was replaced by sequential modalities (e.g. contingent screening) that have enhanced detection while reducing the need for invasive testing. More recently, the introduction of technologies based on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal plasma and enrichment of fetal cells in maternal circulation have further refined the concept of sequential screening. In this review, we document our experience with serum and ultrasound-based contingent screening where we were able to achieve a detection rate of 96.8%, a false-positive rate of 2.8% and an odds of being affected given a positive result of 1:11. We also describe our initial experience with a novel sequential protocol that includes the analysis of fetal cells in maternal blood. Methods for enrichment for fetal cells cfDNA and cfDNA technologies offer the possibility of greater sensitivity and specificity as well as expansion in the scope of genetic disorders detectable. As costs decline, these technologies will become increasingly used as primary screening tools. In the meantime, sequential use offers a practical approach to maximizing the benefits of prenatal testing.

Indexed as

Cell-free DNAChromosome abnormalityFetal cellsMaternal serumScreeningUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID31403132
PMCPMC6687402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.