Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31403119›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2019

Three-dimensional bladder ultrasonography with the BladderScan

Simone Salimans, Jolien Govaerts, Natasja de Jong, Jeroen van Bavel, Leonie Speksnijder

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simone SalimansAmphia Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breda, the Netherlands.
Jolien GovaertsAmphia Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breda, the Netherlands.
Natasja de JongAmphia Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breda, the Netherlands.
Jeroen van BavelAmphia Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breda, the Netherlands.
Leonie SpeksnijderAmphia Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breda, the Netherlands.
Amphia Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePostpartum urinary retention is a frequent complication after childbirth. It is usually a temporary condition. However, unrecognised urinary retention can lead to considerable morbidity due to bladder over distention, detrusor atony and long term voiding dysfunction. In our clinic we noticed an overestimation of post void residual measured with the BladderScan STUDY

designWe included 25 women in this prospective pilot study. These women had a urinary retention over 1000 ml within 4-5 h postpartum. Conform our local protocol, an indwelling catheter was inserted for one week. After removal of the indwelling catheter, a micturition trial was conducted. The post void residual was first measured with BladderScan

resultsThere was a significant mean difference in post void residual measurements with the BladderScan

conclusionThe BladderScan

Indexed as

Clean intermittent catheterizationPostpartum periodUltrasonographyUrinary retentionVoiding dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID31403119
PMCPMC6687368
OpenAlexW2945270098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.