Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31403088›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in physiology2019

Gain control in the sensorimotor system.

Eiman Azim, Kazuhiko Seki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Distinct Cortical Correlates of Perception and Motor Function in Balance Control.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eiman AzimMolecular Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Kazuhiko SekiDepartment of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo 187-8502, Japan.

Funding

Neural control of skilled movements: an ethological dissection of genetically tractable mammalian motor circuitsDP2NS105555 · NINDS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI AZIM, EIMAN · 2017 to 2022
$3.7M
Control of Skilled Forelimb Movements by Cerebellar Feedback CircuitsR00NS088193 · NINDS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI AZIM, EIMAN · 2016 to 2018
$747k
NINDS NIH HHS DP2 NS105555NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS088193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coordinated movement depends on constant interaction between neural circuits that produce motor output and those that report sensory consequences. Fundamental to this process are mechanisms for controlling the influence that sensory signals have on motor pathways - for example, reducing feedback gains when they are disruptive and increasing gains when advantageous. Sensory gain control comes in many forms and serves diverse purposes - in some cases sensory input is attenuated to maintain movement stability and filter out irrelevant or self-generated signals, or enhanced to facilitate salient signals for improved movement execution and adaptation. The ubiquitous presence of sensory gain control across species at multiple levels of the nervous system reflects the importance of tuning the impact that feedback information has on behavioral output.

Indexed as

gain controlmotor correctionsmotor outputmovement stabilityreafferencesensorimotor adaptationsensory feedback

Identifiers

PMID31403088
PMCPMC6688851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.