Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31403067›Full record

ArticleACS central science2019

Linked Toll-Like Receptor Triagonists Stimulate Distinct, Combination-Dependent Innate Immune Responses.

Tyler J Albin, Janine K Tom, Saikat Manna, Adrienne P Gilkes, Samuel A Stetkevich, Benjamin B Katz, Medalyn Supnet, Jiin Felgner, Aarti Jain, Rie Nakajima and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS central science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Glycan-costumed virus-like particles promote type 1 anti-tumor immunity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tyler J AlbinDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, United States.
Janine K TomDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, United States.
Saikat MannaDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, United States.
Adrienne P GilkesVaccine Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, United States.
Samuel A StetkevichDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, United States.
Benjamin B KatzDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, United States.
Medalyn SupnetVaccine Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, United States.
Jiin FelgnerVaccine Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, United States.
Aarti JainVaccine Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, United States.
Rie NakajimaVaccine Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, United States.
Algis JasinskasVaccine Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, United States.
Albert ZlotnikVaccine Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, United States.
Eric PearlmanVaccine Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, United States.
D Huw DaviesVaccine Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, United States.
Phillip L FelgnerVaccine Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, United States.
Amanda M BurkhardtVaccine Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, United States.
Aaron P Esser-KahnDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California 92617, United States.
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional vaccination strategies have failed to generate effective vaccines for many infections like tuberculosis and HIV. New approaches are needed for each type of disease. The protective immunity and distinct responses of many successful vaccines come from activating multiple Toll-like receptors (TLRs). Vaccines with multiple TLRs as adjuvants have proven effective in preclinical studies, but current research has not explored two important elements. First, few multi-TLR systems explore spatial organization-a critical feature of whole-cell vaccines. Second, no multi-TLR systems to date provide systematic analysis of the combinatorial space of three TLR agonists. Here, we present the first examination of the combinatorial space of several spatially defined triple-TLR adjuvants, by synthesizing a series of five triple-TLR agonists and testing their innate activity both

Identifiers

PMID31403067
PMCPMC6661867
OpenAlexW2954248714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.