Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31402983›Full record

ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2019

Bone remodeling effect of a chitosan and calcium phosphate-based composite.

Lilja Kjalarsdóttir, Arna Dýrfjörd, Atli Dagbjartsson, Elín H Laxdal, Gissur Örlygsson, Jóhannes Gíslason, Jón M Einarsson, Chuen-How Ng, Halldór Jónsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Chitosan-Based Biomaterial Scaffolds for the Repair of Infected Bone Defects.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Bio-Functionalized Chitosan for Bone Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lilja KjalarsdóttirDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Landspítali University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Arna DýrfjördDepartment of Materials, Biotechnology and Energy, Innovation Center Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Atli DagbjartssonGenís hf., Siglufjördur, Iceland.
Elín H LaxdalFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Gissur ÖrlygssonDepartment of Materials, Biotechnology and Energy, Innovation Center Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Jóhannes GíslasonGenís hf., Siglufjördur, Iceland.
Jón M EinarssonGenís hf., Siglufjördur, Iceland.
Chuen-How NgGenís hf., Siglufjördur, Iceland.
Halldór JónssonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Landspítali University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chitosan is a biocompatible polymer that has been widely studied for tissue engineering purposes. The aim of this research was to assess bone regenerative properties of an injectable chitosan and calcium phosphate-based composite and identify optimal degree of deacetylation (%DDA) of the chitosan polymer. Drill holes were generated on the left side of a mandible in Sprague-Dawley rats, and the hole was either left empty or filled with the implant. The animals were sacrificed at several time points after surgery (7-22 days) and bone was investigated using micro-CT and histology. No significant new bone formation was observed in the implants themselves at any time points. However, substantial new bone formation was observed in the rat mandible further away from the drill hole. Morphological changes indicating bone formation were found in specimens explanted on Day 7 in animals that received implant. Similar bone formation pattern was seen in control animals with an empty drill hole at later time points but not to the same extent. A second experiment was performed to examine if the %DDA of the chitosan polymer influenced the bone remodeling response. The results suggest that chitosan polymers with %DDA between 50 and 70% enhance the natural bone remodeling mechanism.

Indexed as

bone defectsbone implantbone remodelingchitosandegree of deacetylationmicro-CTrat mandible

Identifiers

PMID31402983
PMCPMC6683952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.