ArticleOncology letters2019
Reverse first dorsal metacarpal artery flap repair of a right thumb epidermis granuloma: A case study.
Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of First Dorsal Metacarpal Artery Flap for Thumb Defects.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2022Article
- First dorsal metacarpal artery perforator-based propeller flap: functional anatomy and clinical application in soft-tissue defects of the dorsal hand and digits.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One case of epidermal granuloma of the right thumb was diagnosed by color Doppler ultrasonography and pathologic examination. Epidermal granuloma resection and reverse island skin flap transplantation were performed to determine the therapeutic effect of a reverse first dorsal metacarpal artery flap repair of an epidermal granuloma of the right thumb. After effective intravenous combined general anesthesia, the skin in the surgical field was disinfected and sterile drapes were placed. An oblique incision was made over the underlying epidermis granuloma. The right palm of the reverse first dorsal metacarpal artery flap was chosen. The pedicle was carefully protected, and the flap was transplanted to the defective skin area. The incision was sutured after hemostasis. A palpable mass with the dimension of the right thumb of the patient was measured by color Doppler ultrasonography and physical examination pre-operatively. The palpable mass was oval in shape and protruded from the skin surface. The palpable mass had an unclear boundary with the surrounding skin and therefore the skin should be removed. If the tendon is exposed after the resection, complications may occur after operation, such as skin necrosis and tendon exposure. Intra-operatively, the mass was 1.5×1.0 cm in size and multi-cystic. The boundary between the palpable mass and the surrounding skin could not be discerned. The skin area (1.5×1.0 cm in size) was completely invaded by the palpable mass, which was closely adhered to the surrounding tissue. The palpable mass was carefully dissected with appropriate protection to the finger nerves and arteries. The palpable mass and affected skin were completely removed, leaving a defect area of ~1.5 ×1.0 cm without skin. The reverse first dorsal metacarpal artery flap was used to repair the defect area. The repaired flap had a good blood supply and peripheral circulation. The operation was successful, and the anesthesia effect was satisfactory. Treatment of a thumb epidermis granuloma with reverse first dorsal metacarpal artery flap was shown to be a feasible strategy with a broad clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.