Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31402900›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2019

A Historical Review on Antibiotic Resistance of Foodborne

Yichao Yang, Kristina M Feye, Zhaohao Shi, Hilary O Pavlidis, Michael Kogut, Amanda J Ashworth, Steven C Ricke

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Infection strategies ofGut microbes reports · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Comparative Genomic Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diversity ofmSphere · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. A Decade of Antimicrobial Resistance in Human and AnimalAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yichao YangDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Fayetteville, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Kristina M FeyeSouthern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, College Station, TX, United States.
Zhaohao ShiCenter of Food Safety, Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Hilary O PavlidisDiamond V, Cedar Rapids, IA, United States.
Michael KogutSouthern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, College Station, TX, United States.
Amanda J AshworthPoultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit (USDA-ARS), Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Steven C RickeSouthern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, College Station, TX, United States.
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USAgricultural Research Service · USDiamond V (United States) · USSouthern Plains Agricultural Research Center · USUnited States Department of Agriculture · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistanceCampylobacterfluoroquinolone resistancehistorical reviewmacrolide

Identifiers

PMID31402900
PMCPMC6676416
OpenAlexW2951529908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.