Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31402586›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2019

Development of omics-based protocols for the microbiological characterization of multi-strain formulations marketed as probiotics: the case of VSL#3.

Diego Mora, Rossella Filardi, Stefania Arioli, Sjef Boeren, Steven Aalvink, Willem M de Vos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Influence of Probiotic Administration on Tracheoesophageal Voice Prosthesis's Function and Microbial Colonisation: A Pilot Study.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. High stability of the genome ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Probiotic VSL#3Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Nutrients · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diego MoraDepartment of Food Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6692-9301
Rossella FilardiDepartment of Food Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Stefania ArioliDepartment of Food Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Sjef BoerenLaboratory of Biochemistry, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Steven AalvinkLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Willem M de VosLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing commercial interest in multi-strain formulations marketed as probiotics has not been accompanied by an equal increase in the evaluation of quality levels of these biotechnological products. The multi-strain product VSL#3 was used as a model to setup a microbiological characterization that could be extended to other formulations with high complexity. Shotgun metagenomics by deep Illumina sequencing was applied to DNA isolated from the commercial VSL#3 product to confirm strains identity safety and composition. Single-cell analysis was used to evaluate the cell viability, and β-galactosidase and urease activity have been used as marker to monitor the reproducibility of the production process. Similarly, these lots were characterized in detail by a metaproteomics approach for which a robust protein extraction protocol was combined with advanced mass spectrometry. The results identified over 1600 protein groups belonging to all strains present in the VSL#3 formulation. Of interest, only 3.2 % proteins showed significant differences mainly related to small variations in strain abundance. The protocols developed in this study addressed several quality criteria that are relevant for marketed multi-strain products and these represent the first efforts to define the quality of complex probiotic formulations such as VSL#3.

Indexed as

Bacterial Proteinsbeta-GalactosidaseDNA, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomicsMicrobial ViabilityMicrobiological TechniquesProbioticsProteomicsTechnology, PharmaceuticalUreaseBacterial Proteinsbeta-GalactosidaseDNA, BacterialUrease

Identifiers

PMID31402586
PMCPMC6801179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.