Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31402486›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2019

Correction of serum NSE reference intervals includes the unidentified hemolysis sample: 1-year data analysis from healthcare individuals.

Erfu Xie, Wei Zhang, Huaguo Xu, Yun Ling, Qiaodi Zhang, Shiyang Pan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Blood-Brain Barrier Biomarkers before and after Kidney Transplantation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erfu XieDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6787-7646
Wei ZhangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Huaguo XuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7170-9445
Yun LingDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Qiaodi ZhangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Shiyang PanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jiangsu Province Hospital · CN

Funding

Key Laboratory for Laboratory Medicine of Jiangsu Province of China ZDXKB2016005Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK2009440, BK20131018the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81101322, 81201359, 81302531 and 81371894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReference intervals (RIs) are important for interpretation of laboratory results. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) can be utilized to aid the diagnosis of various tumors. However, while red blood cells contain NSE αγ-isozymes, unrecognized slight hemolysis will result in increasing of NSE levels in serum. The aim of this study was to correct the NSE RIs from healthcare individuals results which may have unidentified microhemolysis.

methodsA total of 15 047 healthy individuals undergoing regular health care were recruited to redefine the NSE reference interval according to the CA28-A3 document. Volunteers with NSE level between 16.3 ng/mL and the upper limit of new RIs were performed venipuncture for NSE retest. Simultaneously, serum free hemoglobin (fHb) was performed with o-tolidine test.

resultsReestablishment of NSE RIs is 0-18.9 ng/mL, which is wider than 0-16.3 ng/mL provided by the manufacturer. Seventy-four volunteers with the NSE level between 16.3 and 18.9 ng/mL were performed venipuncture for NSE retest. The ratio of NSE level drop to normal is 85.1% (63/74) in the subsequent results; there are significant differences between the median NSE of two groups (18.15 vs 14.15 ng/mL). Subsequently, the fHb concentration of 22 healthy individuals from 74 individuals was measured; there are significant differences between the median fHb of two groups (58 vs 30 mg/L).

conclusionsSome specimens with slightly elevated NSE may be attributed to the unrecognized slight hemolysis. The correction RIs may be expected to decrease the abnormal NSE results.

Indexed as

Data AnalysisDelivery of Health CareHemolysisHemoglobinsHumansPhosphopyruvate HydrataseReference ValuesHemoglobinsPhosphopyruvate Hydratasefree hemoglobinhemolysisneuron-specific enolasereference intervals

Identifiers

PMID31402486
PMCPMC6868418
OpenAlexW2968750955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.