ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2019
Correction of serum NSE reference intervals includes the unidentified hemolysis sample: 1-year data analysis from healthcare individuals.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (LFIA) for tumor marker detection: technical evolution, clinical translation challenges, and future perspectives.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Review
- The Impact of Hemolytic Processes Due to Extracorporeal Support Therapy on the Serum Concentration of the Neuronal Marker Protein NSE.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A Retrospective Assessment of Changes in Stroke Risk-Related Biomarkers in Individuals with Prediabetes from Durban, South Africa: Preliminary Findings.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Blood-Brain Barrier Biomarkers before and after Kidney Transplantation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- The automated processing algorithm to correct the test result of serum neuron-specific enolase affected by specimen hemolysis.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2021Article
- Age-stratified and gender-specific reference intervals of six tumor markers panel of lung cancer: A geographic-based multicenter study in China.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2021Article
- Combining serum calcitonin, carcinoembryonic antigen, and neuron-specific enolase to predict lateral lymph node metastasis in medullary thyroid carcinoma.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020Article
- Correction of serum NSE reference intervals includes the unidentified hemolysis sample: 1-year data analysis from healthcare individuals.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReference intervals (RIs) are important for interpretation of laboratory results. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) can be utilized to aid the diagnosis of various tumors. However, while red blood cells contain NSE αγ-isozymes, unrecognized slight hemolysis will result in increasing of NSE levels in serum. The aim of this study was to correct the NSE RIs from healthcare individuals results which may have unidentified microhemolysis.
methodsA total of 15 047 healthy individuals undergoing regular health care were recruited to redefine the NSE reference interval according to the CA28-A3 document. Volunteers with NSE level between 16.3 ng/mL and the upper limit of new RIs were performed venipuncture for NSE retest. Simultaneously, serum free hemoglobin (fHb) was performed with o-tolidine test.
resultsReestablishment of NSE RIs is 0-18.9 ng/mL, which is wider than 0-16.3 ng/mL provided by the manufacturer. Seventy-four volunteers with the NSE level between 16.3 and 18.9 ng/mL were performed venipuncture for NSE retest. The ratio of NSE level drop to normal is 85.1% (63/74) in the subsequent results; there are significant differences between the median NSE of two groups (18.15 vs 14.15 ng/mL). Subsequently, the fHb concentration of 22 healthy individuals from 74 individuals was measured; there are significant differences between the median fHb of two groups (58 vs 30 mg/L).
conclusionsSome specimens with slightly elevated NSE may be attributed to the unrecognized slight hemolysis. The correction RIs may be expected to decrease the abnormal NSE results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.