Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31402153›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of emergency medicine2019

Imaging in Suspected Renal Colic: Systematic Review of the Literature and Multispecialty Consensus.

Christopher L Moore, Christopher R Carpenter, Marta E Heilbrun, Kevin Klauer, Amy Krambeck, Courtney Moreno, Erick M Remer, Charles Scales, Melissa M Shaw, Kevan M Sternberg

Abstract readSystematic ReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Trends in visits, imaging, and diagnosis for emergency department abdominal pain presentations in the United States, 2007-2019.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Renal colic imaging: Are we Choosing Wisely?Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christopher L MooreDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Electronic address: Chris.moore@yale.edu.
Christopher R CarpenterDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO.
Marta E HeilbrunDepartment of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Kevin KlauerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN; Department of Osteopathic Specialties, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Amy KrambeckDepartment of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Courtney MorenoDepartment of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Erick M RemerImaging Institute and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Charles ScalesDuke Clinical Research Institute and the Department of Surgery (Urology), Duke University, School of Medicine Durham, NC.
Melissa M ShawDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Kevan M SternbergDepartment of Urology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT.

Funding

Minimizing Unnecessary Irradiation from Renal Colic CT Scans in the United StatesR18HS023778 · AHRQ · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, CHRISTOPHER L · 2015 to 2019
$1.2M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS023778
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveRenal colic is common and computed tomography (CT) is frequently used when the diagnosis of kidney stone is suspected. CT is accurate but exposes patients to ionizing radiation and has not been shown to alter either interventional approaches or hospital admission rates. This multiorganizational transdisciplinary collaboration seeks evidence-based, multispecialty consensus on optimal imaging across different clinical scenarios in patients with suspected renal colic in the acute setting.

methodsIn conjunction with the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Emergency Quality Network, we formed a 9-member panel with 3 physician representatives each from ACEP, the American College of Radiology, and the American Urology Association. A systematic literature review was used as the basis for a 3-step modified Delphi process to seek consensus on optimal imaging in 29 specific clinical scenarios.

resultsFrom an initial search yielding 6,337 records, there were 232 relevant articles of acceptable evidence quality to guide the literature summary. At the completion of the Delphi process consensus, out of the 29 scenarios agreement was rated as perfect in 15 (52%), excellent in 8 (28%), good in 3 (10%), and moderate in 3 (10%). There were no scenarios in which at least moderate consensus was not reached. CT was recommended in 7 scenarios (24%), with ultrasonography in 9 (31%) and no further imaging needed in 12 (45%).

conclusionEvidence and multispecialty consensus support ultrasonography or no further imaging in specific clinical scenarios, with reduced-radiation-dose CT to be used when CT is needed for patients with suspected renal colic.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyAdultAgedDelphi TechniqueEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPoint-of-Care SystemsRenal Colic

Identifiers

PMID31402153
PMCPMC13014276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.