Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31402072›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology2020

A patient- and assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial of axillary reverse mapping (ARM) in patients with early breast cancer.

Martinus A Beek, Paul D Gobardhan, Elisabeth G Klompenhouwer, Marian B Menke-Pluijmers, Pascal Steenvoorde, Jos Ws Merkus, Harm Jt Rutten, Adri C Voogd, Ernest Jt Luiten

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Martinus A BeekDepartment of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands. Electronic address: MBeek@amphia.nl.
Paul D GobardhanDepartment of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Elisabeth G KlompenhouwerDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marian B Menke-PluijmersDepartment of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Pascal SteenvoordeDepartment of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente Hospital, Twente, the Netherlands.
Jos Ws MerkusDepartment of Surgery, Haga Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Harm Jt RuttenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Adri C VoogdDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Research Institute Growth and Development (GROW), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Ernest Jt LuitenDepartment of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Amphia Ziekenhuis · NLAlbert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NLHaga Hospital · NLMaastricht University · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLOncode Institute · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAxillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer patients is infamous for its accompanying morbidity. Selective preservation of upper extremity lymphatic drainage and accompanying lymph nodes crossing the axillary basin - currently resected during a standard ALND - has been proposed as a valuable surgical refinement.

methodsPeroperative Axillary Reversed Mapping (ARM) was used for selective preservation of upper extremity lymphatic drainage. A multicentre patient- and assessor-blinded randomized study was performed in clinical node negative, sentinel node positive early breast cancer patients. Patients were randomized to undergo either standard-ALND or ARM-ALND. Primary outcome was the presence of surgery-related lymphedema at six, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. Secondary outcomes included patient reported and objective signs and symptoms of lymphedema, pain, paraesthesia, numbness, loss of shoulder mobility, quality of life and axillary recurrence risk.

resultsNo significant differences were found between both groups using the water displacement method with respect to measured lymphedema. ARM-ALND resulted in less reported complaints of lymphedema at six, 12 and 24 months postoperatively (p < 0.05). No axillary recurrence was found in both groups.

conclusionsIn contrast to results of volumetric measurement, patient reported outcomes support selective sparing of the upper extremity lymphatic drainage using ARM as valuable surgical refinement in case of ALND in clinically node negative, sentinel node positive early breast cancer. If completion ALND in clinically node negative, sentinel node positive early breast cancer is considered, selective sparing of upper extremity axillary lymphatics by implementing ARM should be carried out in order to reduce morbidity.

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionAdultAgedAxillaBreast NeoplasmsColoring AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymphedemaMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingNetherlandsPain MeasurementColoring AgentsAxillary lymph node dissectionAxillary reverse mappingBreast cancerLymphedema

Identifiers

PMID31402072
OpenAlexW2966276511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.