ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2019
The need for an adapted initiation nomogram during Fiix prothrombin time monitoring of warfarin.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low incidence of thromboembolism with Fiix-monitored warfarin compared to conventional warfarin and DOACs in patients with AF.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2025Article
- Replacement of traditional prothrombin time monitoring with the new Fiix prothrombin time increases the efficacy of warfarin without increasing bleeding. A review article.Thrombosis journal · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The new Fiix prothrombin time (Fiix-PT) and its derived Fiix-normalized ratio (Fiix-NR) is affected only by reductions in coagulation factors (F) II and X, the two factors responsible for the antithrombotic effect of vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Due to insensitivity to reductions in the short half-life FVII, the Fiix-NR rises later than standard PT-INR during warfarin initiation. To describe a warfarin initiation nomogram adapted for monitoring with Fiix-NR, anticoagulation development was assessed during use of standard PT-INR based initiation nomogram and after adapting the initiation nomogram for Fiix-NR monitoring. Normalized ratios were retrospectively assessed in consecutive warfarin naïve patients during their first 60 days of warfarin intake for one year prior to (PT-INR period) and for one year after replacing the PT-INR with the Fiix-NR (Fiix-NR period). The INR target was NR 2.0-3.0. We evaluated 160 patients monitored with PT-INR and dosed with the PT-nomogram, 57 monitored with Fiix-INR but dosed with PT-nomogram, and 163 Fiix-NR monitored patients dosed using a new Fiix nomogram. Mean PT-INR over 2.0 was reached on day 7 during the PT-period and remained around 2.5 thereafter. When the PT-nomogram continued in use during Fiix-monitoring significantly more patients became overanticoagulated during days 11-29. After the nomogram was modified to respond to rising Fiix-NR with larger initial dose reduction, the mean Fiix-NR reached over 2 on day 8-9 and remained around 2.5 thereafter. When warfarin is monitored with Fiix-NR, an adjusted dosing nomogram should be used during initiation to prevent early overanticoagulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31401717What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.