Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31401607›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Single-arm, open-label, dose escalation phase I study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation with electroencephalography biomarkers in paediatric disorders of consciousness: a study protocol.

Ghazala T Saleem, Joshua Benjamin Ewen, Jewel E Crasta, Beth S Slomine, Gabriela Lucila Cantarero, Stacy J Suskauer

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03618849 naterminatednot on this map

Safety and Feasibility of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pediatric Acquired Brain Injury (tDCS in Pediatric ABI)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.Ran2019 to 2024Enrolled1ConditionsAcquired Brain Injury, Disorders of ConsciousnessArmstDCS
NCT05929274 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pediatric Disorders of Consciousness

TypeinterventionalSponsorGiovanna CristellaRan2024 to 2028Enrolled0ConditionsDisorder of ConsciousnessArmstDCS, sham tDCS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Extracerebral Normalization ofNeurocritical care · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ghazala T SaleemKennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Joshua Benjamin EwenKennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jewel E CrastaKennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Beth S SlomineKennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Gabriela Lucila CantareroPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Stacy J SuskauerKennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA suskauer@kennedykrieger.org.

Funding

Research Training in Rehabilitation for Brain Injury and Neurological DisabilityT32HD007414 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI Amy J. Bastian · 1991 to 2026
$6.3M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChildren with disorders of consciousness (DOC) represent the highest end of the acquired brain injury (ABI) severity spectrum for survivors and experience a multitude of functional impairments. Current clinical management in DOC uses behavioural evaluation measures and interventions that fail to (1) describe the physiological consequences of ABI and (2) elicit functional gains. In paediatric DOC, there is a critical need to develop evidence-based interventions to promote recovery of basic responses to improve rehabilitation and aid decision-making for medical teams and caregivers. The purpose of this investigation is to examine the safety, tolerability and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in children with DOC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is an open-label dose escalation trial evaluating the safety, tolerability and feasibility of tDCS in 10 children (5-17 years) receiving inpatient rehabilitation for DOC. This study will follow a modified rule-based design, allowing for intrapatient escalation, where a cohort of patients will be assigned to an initial tDCS current of 0.5 or 1 mA based on participant's head circumference and according to the safety data available in other paediatric populations. The subsequent assignment of increased current (1 or 2 mA) according to the prespecified rules will be based on the clinical observation of adverse events in the patients. The study will include up to three, 20 min sessions of anodal tDCS (sham, 0.5 or 1 mA, 1 or 2 mA) applied over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The primary outcomes are adverse events, pain associated with tDCS and intolerable disruption of inpatient care. Secondary outcomes are changes in electroencephalography (EEG) phase-locking and event-related potential components and the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised total score from prestimulation to poststimulation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Johns Hopkins IRB (#IRB00174966) approved this study. Trial results will be disseminated through journals and conferences. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03618849.

Indexed as

AdolescentBiomarkersBrain Injuries, TraumaticChildChild, PreschoolClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicConsciousness DisordersElectroencephalographyFeasibility StudiesHumansProof of Concept StudyTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersbrain injurieschildelectroencephalographytDCStranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID31401607
PMCPMC6701812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.