Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31401602›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Impact of China's healthcare price reforms on traditional Chinese medicine public hospitals in Beijing: an interrupted time-series study.

Dawei Zhu, Xuefeng Shi, Stephen Nicholas, Qian Bai, Ping He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Medical Service Utilization and Direct Medical Cost of Stroke in Urban China.International journal of health policy and management · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dawei Zhu *China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Xuefeng Shi *School of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Stephen NicholasSchool of Economics and School of Management, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China.
Qian BaiSchool of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Ping HeChina Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China phe@pku.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the 2017 implementation of China's 2009 healthcare price reforms on Beijing's secondary and tertiary traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) hospitals.

designWe employed a panel-interrupted time-series model with hospital fixed effects to estimate the impact of the price reforms.

settingBeijing, April 2014 to April 2018.

participantsAll TCM hospitals in Beijing. OUTCOME MEASURES: Our dependent variables comprised the monthly outpatient and inpatient revenues, the number of monthly outpatient visits and inpatient admissions, the average total expenditures per outpatient visit and per inpatient admission, the average drug expenditures (except herbal medicines) per outpatient visit and per inpatient admission and the average medical service expenditures per outpatient visit and per inpatient admission.

resultsIn tertiary hospitals, the price reforms led to significant reductions in the number of outpatient visits (23.1%), inpatients admission (4.6%) and drug expenditures (except herbal medicines) per inpatient admission (14.0%), and an instant raise in average total expenditure per outpatient (22.0%), medical service expenditures per outpatient visit (58.2%) and inpatient admission (19.0%). There was no significant association between the price reforms and the monthly outpatient and inpatient revenues. After the price reforms, the previous upward trend in medical service expenditures per outpatient visit rose more sharply (from 0.5% to 1.6%). In secondary hospitals, the price reforms decreased the level of drug expenditures (except herbal medicines) per outpatient visit (13.0%) and per inpatient admission (20.8%), but increased medical service expenditures per inpatient admission by 19.0%.

conclusionThe Beijing price reforms adjusted the cost structures in secondary and tertiary TCM hospitals without negatively impacting the operation of the hospitals, and through the increased hierarchical medical service fee, shifted patient choices away from tertiary to other health facilities, especially for patients with minor illnesses.

Indexed as

Health Care ReformAmbulatory CareChinaDrug CostsHealth ExpendituresHospitals, PublicHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisPatient Admissionhealthcare price reforminterrupted time-seriestraditional chinese medicine hospitals

Identifiers

PMID31401602
PMCPMC6701667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.