Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31401597›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

What causes prescribing errors in children? Scoping review.

Richard L Conn, Orla Kearney, Mary P Tully, Michael D Shields, Tim Dornan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Preventing Medication Errors in Paediatrics: A Narrative Review.Clinical medicine insights. Pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Driven Discharge Medication Reconciliation Service Pilot at a Children's Hospital.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2024
    Article
  16. Pharmacotherapy for Children and Adolescents.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Richard L ConnCentre for Medical Education, Queen's University Belfast School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2564-254X
Orla KearneyQueen's University Belfast School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Belfast, UK.
Mary P TullyDivision of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.
Michael D ShieldsPaediatrics, Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast, UK.
Tim DornanCentre for Medical Education, Queen's University Belfast School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Belfast, UK T.Dornan@qub.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives(1) Systematically assemble, analyse and synthesise published evidence on causes of prescribing error in children. (2) Present results to a multidisciplinary group of paediatric prescribing stakeholders to validate findings and establish how causative factors lead to errors in practice.

designScoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's framework, including stakeholder consultation; qualitative evidence synthesis.

methodsWe followed the six scoping review stages. (1) Research question-the research question was 'What is known about causes of prescribing error in children?' (2) Search strategy-we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL (from inception to February 2018), grey literature and reference lists of included studies. (3) Article selection-all published evidence contributing information on the causes of prescribing error in children was eligible for inclusion. We included review articles as secondary evidence to broaden understanding. (4) Charting data-results were collated in a custom data charting form. (5) Reporting results-we summarised article characteristics, extracted causal evidence and thematically synthesised findings. (6) Stakeholder consultation-results were presented to a multidisciplinary focus group of six prescribing stakeholders to establish validity, relevance and mechanisms by which causes lead to errors in practice.

results68 articles were included. We identified six main causes of prescribing errors:

conclusionsSpecific factors complicate prescribing for children and increase risk of errors. Primary research is needed to confirm and elaborate these causes of error. In the meantime, this review uses existing evidence to make provisional paediatric-specific recommendations for policy, practice and education.

Indexed as

Dosage FormsDrug Dosage CalculationsMedication ErrorsOff-Label UseChildHumansDosage Formsmedical education and trainingpaediatricsqualitative researchtherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID31401597
PMCPMC6701596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.