Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31401239›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

Direct electrophysiological mapping of human pitch-related processing in auditory cortex.

Phillip E Gander, Sukhbinder Kumar, William Sedley, Kirill V Nourski, Hiroyuki Oya, Christopher K Kovach, Hiroto Kawasaki, Yukiko Kikuchi, Roy D Patterson, Matthew A Howard and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Dynamics of Pitch Perception in the Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Distinct Representations of Tonotopy and Pitch in Human Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Phillip E GanderHuman Brain Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. Electronic address: phillip-gander@uiowa.edu.
Sukhbinder KumarInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University Medical School, Newcastle, UK; Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK. Electronic address: sukhbinder.kumar@newcastle.ac.uk.
William SedleyInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University Medical School, Newcastle, UK. Electronic address: william.sedley@newcastle.ac.uk.
Kirill V NourskiHuman Brain Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; Iowa Neuroscience Institute, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. Electronic address: kirill-nourski@uiowa.edu.
Hiroyuki OyaHuman Brain Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. Electronic address: hiroyuki-oya@uiowa.edu.
Christopher K KovachHuman Brain Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. Electronic address: christopher-kovach@uiowa.edu.
Hiroto KawasakiHuman Brain Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. Electronic address: hiroto-kawasaki@uiowa.edu.
Yukiko KikuchiInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University Medical School, Newcastle, UK. Electronic address: yukiko-kikuchi@newcastle.ac.uk.
Roy D PattersonDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: rdp1@cam.ac.uk.
Matthew A HowardHuman Brain Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; Iowa Neuroscience Institute, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; Pappajohn Biomedical Institute, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. Electronic address: matthew-howard@uioaw.edu.
Timothy D GriffithsHuman Brain Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University Medical School, Newcastle, UK; Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK. Electronic address: tim.griffiths@newcastle.ac.uk.

Funding

HUMAN AUDITORY CORTEX PHYSIOLOGYR01DC004290 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HOWARD, MATTHEW A. · 2000 to 2025
$13.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004290Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work sought correlates of pitch perception, defined by neural activity above the lower limit of pitch (LLP), in auditory cortical neural ensembles, and examined their topographical distribution. Local field potentials (LFPs) were recorded in eight patients undergoing invasive recordings for pharmaco-resistant epilepsy. Stimuli consisted of bursts of broadband noise followed by regular interval noise (RIN). RIN was presented at rates below and above the LLP to distinguish responses related to the regularity of the stimulus and the presence of pitch itself. LFPs were recorded from human cortical homologues of auditory core, belt, and parabelt regions using multicontact depth electrodes implanted in Heschl's gyrus (HG) and Planum Temporale (PT), and subdural grid electrodes implanted over lateral superior temporal gyrus (STG). Evoked responses corresponding to the temporal regularity of the stimulus were assessed using autocorrelation of the evoked responses, and occurred for stimuli below and above the LLP. Induced responses throughout the high gamma range (60-200 Hz) were present for pitch values above the LLP, with onset latencies of approximately 70 ms. Mapping of the induced responses onto a common brain space demonstrated variability in the topographical distribution of high gamma responses across subjects. Induced responses were present throughout the length of HG and on PT, which is consistent with previous functional neuroimaging studies. Moreover, in each subject, a region within lateral STG showed robust induced responses at pitch-evoking stimulus rates. This work suggests a distributed representation of pitch processing in neural ensembles in human homologues of core and non-core auditory cortex.

Indexed as

AdultAuditory CortexBrain MappingElectrocorticographyEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPitch PerceptionElectrocorticographyEvokedHigh gammaInducedNeurophysiology

Identifiers

PMID31401239
PMCPMC6819238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.